David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 61 (236):151 - 171 (1986)
Courage is dangerous. If it is defined in traditional ways, as a set of dispositions to overcome fear, to oppose obstacles, to perform difficult or dangerous actions, its claim to be a virtue is questionable. Unlike the virtue of justice, or a sense of proportion, traditional courage does not itself determine what is to be done, let alone assure that it is worth doing. If we retain the traditional conception of courage and its military connotations–overcoming and combat–we should be suspicious of it. Instead of automatically classifying it as a virtue, attempting to develop and exercise it, we should become alert to its dangers. And yet and yet. There is an aspect of traditional courage that serves us: we require the capacities and traits that enable us to persist in acting well under stress, to endure hardships when following our judgments about what is best is difficult or dangerous. If courage is checked, redefined as the virtue that enables virtue–the various sets of dispositions, whatever they may be, that make us resolute in worthy, difficult action–then we need not fear the dangers of courage. We need rather to reform it by diversifying it, as a heterogeneous variety of traits that enable us to act well under stress, against the natural movements of self-protection
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Leslie E. Sekerka & Richard P. Bagozzi (2007). Moral Courage in the Workplace: Moving to and From the Desire and Decision to Act. Business Ethics 16 (2):132–149.
Similar books and articles
Per Bauhn (2007). Two Concepts of Courage. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:65-68.
Elizabeth V. Spelman (2003). Book Review: Amelie Oksenberg Rorty. The Many Faces of Evil: Historical Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. [REVIEW] Hypatia 18 (2):229-232.
Jonathan J. Sanford (2010). Are You Man Enough? Aristotle and Courage. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):431-445.
Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (2006). The Vanishing Subject: The Many Faces of Subjectivity. History of Philosophy Quarterly 23 (3):191 - 209.
Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (1993). The Many Faces of Gibbard's Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Ethics 103 (2):318-328.
Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (1987). The Two Faces of Spinoza. Review of Metaphysics 41 (2):299 - 316.
Linda R. Rabieh (2006). Plato and the Virtue of Courage. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Per Bauhn (2003). The Value of Courage. Nordic Academic Press.
Xinyan Jiang (2007). Courage and Self-Control. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:59-64.
Richard Avramenko (2011). Courage: The Politics of Life and Limb. University of Notre Dame Press.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads35 ( #68,150 of 1,696,167 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #177,962 of 1,696,167 )
How can I increase my downloads?