Review essay: Stakes and kidneys: Why markets in human body parts are morally imperative, by James Stacey Taylor
HEC Forum 17 (4) (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames Stacey Taylor (2001). Human Freedom and God's Foreknowledge. Philo 4 (1):97-104.
J. S. Taylor (2006). Black Markets, Transplant Kidneys and Interpersonal Coercion. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):698-701.
James Stacey Taylor (2007). Review Essay: John Meadowcroft, the Ethics of the Market. HEC Forum 19 (2).
Debra Satz (2008). The Moral Limits of Markets: The Case of Human Kidneys. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):269-288.
James Stacey Taylor (2005). Bodies for Sale: Ethics and Exploitation in the Human Body Trade. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (5).
James Stacey Taylor (2006). Introduction: Markets and Medicine. Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):149-154.
James Stacey Taylor (2006). Why Markets in Proto-Deceptive Goods Should Be Restricted. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):325 - 335.
J. R. Kuntz (2009). A Litmus Test for Exploitation: James Stacey Taylor's Stakes and Kidneys. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):552-572.
David Resnik (2008). Stakes and Kidneys: Why Markets in Human Body Parts Are Morally Imperative. Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (1):169-170.
Paul Hughes (2006). A Review Of: “James Stacey Taylor, Stakes and Kidneys: Why Markets in Human Body Parts Are Morally Imperative”. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):93-94.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,458 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
