David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):136-145 (2011)
Personalism is one of the philosophical perspectives which hold that the reality in person and the human person has the highest intrinsic value. This paper makes reference to Louis Janssens' eight criteria in adequate consideration of the human person but further argues that there is need to consider people as situated agents especially within gender relational perspectives. The paper identifies gender as an important social construction that shapes the consideration of the human persons within socio-spatial spheres. The main crux of the paper is that there is a gender context of personalism and this has profound implications for bioethical agendas. Gender is part of the human condition, especially when we philosophically or sociologically engage the notion of equity and equality within the social system, because social realities in the relational perspective are not impartial, impersonal and equal. Gender does not determine morality but it plays a role in morality and expectations from moral agents. Women have been categorised as a sociological group because their integrity, freedom/autonomy and dignity (which are basic concerns of bioethics) are capable of being threatened. A gender perspective provides important incentives for moral theory which searches for possible conceptual imbalances or blind spots in ethical reflections. The paper refers to Sen's faces of gender inequality and expands on the notion that natality inequality is one of the fundamental levels of gender inequality, which in turn is the primary starting agenda in bioethics. The paper avers that the recognition of the fundamental importance of gender to the organization of social reality and the development of personal identities have important practical implications for bioethics
|Keywords||personalism gender bioethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John A. Robertson (2001). Preconception Gender Selection. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):2 – 9.
Mari Mikkola (2011). Ontological Commitments, Sex and Gender. In Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics. Springer. 67--83.
J. Butler (2004). Undoing Gender. Routledge.
Janet Saltzman Chafetz (2004). Gendered Power and Privilege: Taking Lenski One Step Further. Sociological Theory 22 (2):269-277.
Belinda Bennett & Isabel Karpin (2008). Regulatory Options for Gender Equity in Health Research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):80 - 99.
T. V. Barchunova (2003). The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
Regina M. O'Neill & Stacy D. Blake-Beard (2002). Gender Barriers to the Female Mentor – Male Protégé Relationship. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):51 - 63.
Anca Gheaus (2008). Basic Income, Gender Justice and the Costs of Gender-Symmetrical Lifestyles. Basic Income Studies 3 (3).
Charlotte Witt (2011). What Is Gender Essentialism? In Feminist Metaphysics. Springer Verlag. 11--25.
Kate Grosser (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Equality: Women as Stakeholders and the European Union Sustainability Strategy. Business Ethics 18 (3):290-307.
M. Joy (2010). The Impact of Gender on Religious Studies. Diogenes 57 (1):93-102.
Added to index2011-11-22
Total downloads14 ( #163,935 of 1,696,627 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #250,163 of 1,696,627 )
How can I increase my downloads?