David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Episteme 5 (1):pp. 129-139 (2008)
In Democratic Authority, David Estlund 2008 presents a major new defense of democracy, called epistemic proceduralism. The theory claims that democracy exercises legitimate authority in virtue of possessing a modest epistemic power: its decisions are the product of procedures that tend to produce just laws at a better than chance rate, and better than any other type of government that is justifiable within the terms of public reason. The balance Estlund strikes between epistemic and non-epistemic justifications of democracy is open to question, both for its neglect of the roles of non-epistemic values of equality and collective autonomy in democracy, and for the ways his use of the public reason standard overshadows empirically based epistemic arguments for democracy. Nevertheless, Estlund presents telling critiques of rival theories and develops a sophisticated alternative that illuminates some central normative features of democracy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David M. Estlund (2008). Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton University Press.
Henry S. Richardson (2005). Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning About the Ends of Policy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):204-210.
Blain Neufeld (2005). Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.
Citations of this work BETA
Aaron Ancell (forthcoming). Democracy Isn't That Smart : On Landemore's Democratic Reason. Episteme:1-15.
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2012). Estlund on Epistocracy: A Critique. [REVIEW] Res Publica 18 (3):241-258.
Similar books and articles
Elizabeth Anderson (2006). The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme 3 (1-2):8-22.
Michael Fuerstein (2008). Epistemic Democracy and the Social Character of Knowledge. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 74-93.
Christian List & Robert E. Goodin (2001). Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem. Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306.
David Estlund (2005). What's so Rickety? Richardson's Non-Epistemic Democracy. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):204–204.
Thomas Christiano (2008). The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits. OUP Oxford.
David Estlund (2008). Introduction: Epistemic Approaches to Democracy. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 1-4.
William Nelson (2008). The Epistemic Value of the Democratic Process. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 19-32.
Fabienne Peter (2007). Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Fabienne Peter (2008). Pure Epistemic Proceduralism. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 33-55.
Patrick Tomlin (2012). Should We Be Utopophobes About Democracy in Particular? Political Studies Review 10 (1):36-47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads283 ( #8,674 of 1,934,666 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #28,350 of 1,934,666 )
How can I increase my downloads?