An epistemic defense of democracy: David Estlund's democratic authority
Episteme 5 (1):pp. 129-139 (2008)
| Abstract | In Democratic Authority, David Estlund 2008 presents a major new defense of democracy, called epistemic proceduralism. The theory claims that democracy exercises legitimate authority in virtue of possessing a modest epistemic power: its decisions are the product of procedures that tend to produce just laws at a better than chance rate, and better than any other type of government that is justifiable within the terms of public reason. The balance Estlund strikes between epistemic and non-epistemic justifications of democracy is open to question, both for its neglect of the roles of non-epistemic values of equality and collective autonomy in democracy, and for the ways his use of the public reason standard overshadows empirically based epistemic arguments for democracy. Nevertheless, Estlund presents telling critiques of rival theories and develops a sophisticated alternative that illuminates some central normative features of democracy | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesElizabeth Anderson (2006). The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme 3 (1-2):8-22.
Michael Fuerstein (2008). Epistemic Democracy and the Social Character of Knowledge. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 74-93.
Christin List & Robert E. Goodin (2001). Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem. Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306.
David Estlund (2005). What's so Rickety? Richardson's Non-Epistemic Democracy. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):204–204.
Thomas Christiano (2010). The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. OUP Oxford.
David Estlund (2008). Introduction: Epistemic Approaches to Democracy. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 1-4.
William Nelson (2008). The Epistemic Value of the Democratic Process. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 19-32.
Fabienne Peter (2007). Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Fabienne Peter (2008). Pure Epistemic Proceduralism. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 33-55.
Patrick Tomlin (2012). Should We Be Utopophobes About Democracy in Particular? In Political Studies Review 10 (2012). Political Studies Review 10 (1):36-47.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads200 ( #1,280 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #5,502 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
