Graduate studies at Western
In Rainer Forst (ed.), Sozialphilosophie und Kritik. Suhrkamp (forthcoming)
|Abstract||From the outset, critical social theory has sought to diagnose people’s participation in their own oppression, by revealing the roots of irrational and self-undermining choices in the complex interplay between human nature, social structures, and cultural beliefs. As part of this project, Ideologiekritik has aimed to expose faulty conceptions of this interplay, so that the objectively pathological character of what people are “freely” choosing could come more clearly into view. The challenge, however, has always been to find a way of doing this without arrogantly assuming special access to what is good for people. And this danger of paternalism is one to which social theorists have all too often fallen prey. In this brief essay, I focus on contemporary instances of clearly self-defeating behavior in contexts of complex choices. I begin by discussing a recent attempt to diagnose and solve these failures of choices, namely the public policy recommendations of behavioral economist Richard Thaler and reform-minded legal theorist Cass Sunstein. Their influential “libertarian paternalist” approach is particularly interesting, both in what it includes (attention to the socially constructed nature of choice situations and the roots of the problems in human nature) and in what it leaves out (an understanding of the social construction of human nature and an adequate appreciation of the value of autonomy). After discussing it, I consider a broadly perfectionist alternative, to the effect that the problem lies in a failure to adequately appreciate the importance of developing autonomy. I then turn to sketching the outlines of a new approach, based on the concept of “autonomy gaps,” which approaches overly demanding policies in relational and action-theoretical terms. In the final section, I show how this provides the basis for an analysis both in terms of a critique of ideology and of social pathology.|
|Keywords||Autonomy Paternalism Critical theory Honneth|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas R. V. Nys (2008). Paternalism in Public Health Care. Public Health Ethics 1 (1):64-72.
Sylvia Burrow (2012). Reproductive Autonomy and Reproductive Technology. Techné 16 (1):31-45.
John Philip Christman (ed.) (1989). The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy. Oxford University Press.
Andrea Westlund (2009). Rethinking Relational Autonomy. Hypatia 24 (4):26 - 49.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
Gerald Dworkin (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Simon Clarke (2002). A Definition of Paternalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (1):81-91.
L. B. McCullough & Alan W. Cross (1985). Respect for Autonomy and Medical Paternalism Reconsidered. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 6 (3).
Added to index2009-03-10
Total downloads158 ( #2,992 of 722,947 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #5,033 of 722,947 )
How can I increase my downloads?