Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The purpose of this project is to advance the thesis that the notion of an appropriative self, reconstructed from the philosophy of William James, answers, in part, the concerns outlined in the Critical Theory of Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer. Initially I focus on explicating Adorno and Horkheimer's diagnosis, that ideological consciousness is the product of the dialectic of enlightenment. According to their view, culture is a reconciliation of the ego's impulse to persist and regress. Only after such an expansive diagnosis can Adorno and Horkheimer suggest the possibility for social transformation. Next I concern myself with the straightforward task of carefully expositing the philosophical landscape of William James' radical empiricism. Finally I address the dialectic of enlightenment in terms of James' philosophy. Building on the foundations of radical empiricism, my thesis seeks to show how radical empiricism can accommodate Adorno and Horkheimer's metaphysical sensibilities, accelerating and expanding the diagnostic sweep of critical theory. This, I conclude, will involve James' notion of an appropriative self that actively counters the metaphysical forces at work in the dialectic of enlightenment|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
John F. Kavanaugh (1975). "The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950," by Martin Jay; "Critical Theory," by Max Horkheimer; "Dialectic of Enlightenment," by Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adomo; "Negative Dialectics," by Theodor W. Adorno; "The Jargon of Authenticity," by Theodor W. Adorno; and "The Critique of Domination," by Trent Schroyer. [REVIEW] The Modern Schoolman 52 (4):427-432.
Todd Bates (2011). Baptizing Adorno's Odysseus. The European Legacy 15 (5):599-617.
Hauke Brunkhorst (2000). Enlightenment of Rationality: Remarks on Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment. Constellations 7 (1):133-140.
Nigel Tubbs, Hegel and the Dialectic of Enlightenment : The Recognition of Education in Civil Society.
Pierre-François Noppen (2012). Reflective Rationality and the Claim of Dialectic of Enlightenment. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2).
Eric S. Nelson (2011). Revisiting the Dialectic of Environment: Nature as Ideology and Ethics in Adorno and the Frankfurt School. Telos 2011 (155):105-126.
Anthony J. Cascardi (1999). Consequences of Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Marianna Papastephanou (2000). Ulysses' Reason, Nobody's Fault: Reason, Subjectivity and the Critique of Enlightenment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):47-59.
Avner Cohen (2011). Myth and Myth Criticism Following the Dialectic of Enlightenment. The European Legacy 15 (5):583-598.
Alison Stone (2006). Adorno and the Disenchantment of Nature. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):231-253.
Sara Beardsworth (2005). Benjamin, Horkheimer, and Adorno. Idealistic Studies 35 (1):61-72.
Max Pensky (2004). Natural History: The Life and Afterlife of a Concept in Adorno. Critical Horizons 5 (1):227-258.
Max Horkheimer (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-08
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?