Erkenntnis 69 (3):315 - 333 (2008)
|Abstract||In this paper, a solution to the problem of theoretical terms is developed that is based on Carnap’s doctrine of indirect interpretation of theoretical terms. This doctrine will be given a semantic, model-theoretic explanation that is not given by Carnap himself as he remains content with a syntactic explanation. From that semantic explanation, rules for the truth-value assignment to postulates, i.e. sentences that determine the meaning of theoretical terms, are derived. The logical status of postulates will be clarified thereby in such a way that the problem of theoretical terms disappears.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Roberts (2001). Introduction. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):67-71.
John A. Winnie (1965). Theoretical Terms and Partial Definitions. Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):324-328.
Henri Galinon (2009). Les Termes Théoriques, de Carnap à Lewis. Philonsorbonne 4:1-12.
Yann Benétreau-Dupin (2011). An Empiricist Criterion of Meaning. South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):95-108.
James Child (1971). On the Theoretical Dependence of Correspondence Postulates. Philosophy of Science 38 (2):170-177.
Michael Friedman (forthcoming). Carnap on Theoretical Terms: Structuralism Without Metaphysics. Synthese.
Hanspeter Rings (1987). Das Strukturalistische Problem der Theoretischen Begriffe Und Seine Lösung. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 18 (1-2):296-312.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #78,732 of 549,224 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,224 )
How can I increase my downloads?