Assessing the Accountability of the Benefit Corporation: Will This New Gray Sector Organization Enhance Corporate Social Responsibility?
Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):133-150 (2012)
|Abstract||In recent years the benefit corporation has emerged as a new organizational form dedicated to legitimizing the pursuit of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Eschewing traditional governmental authority, the benefit corporation derives its moral legitimacy from the values of its owners and the oversight of a third party evaluator. This research identifies the benefit corporation as a new type of gray sector organization (GSO) and applies extant theory on GSOs to analyze its design. In particular, it shows how the theory of GSO accountability can be used to assess the potential of benefit corporations for enhancing CSR. This research first examines the statutes that have established benefit corporations in five states in the US, along with bills in other states, to show how legislation defines their specific public benefits and holds them accountable for delivering these benefits. It then compares the accountability of the benefit corporation with that of other corporate - centric GSOs, e.g., GSOs that closely resemble traditional corporations. It concludes with significant design-based concerns about the utility of the benefit corporation as an effective organization for implementing CSR|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rob Maessen, Paul Setervans & Eleonore Rijckevorsevanl (2007). Circles of Stakeholders: Towards a Relational Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (1):77-94.
Jean-Pascal Gond & Guido Palazzo (2005). The Socially Responsible Corporation, The Law and The Sicilian Mafia. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:124-129.
Janine S. Hiller (forthcoming). The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics.
R. Boddy Clive, K. Ladyshewsky Richard & Peter Galvin (forthcoming). The Influence of Corporate Psychopaths on Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Commitment to Employees. Journal of Business Ethics.
John Forge (2002). Corporate Responsibility Revisited. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):13-32.
S. Prakash Sethi (2003). Globalization and the Good Corporation: A Need for Proactive Co-Existence. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):21 - 31.
Dorothea Baur & Hans Peter Schmitz (2012). Corporations and NGOs: When Accountability Leads to Co-Optation. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):9-21.
Dwight R. Lee & Richard B. McKenzie (1994). Corporate Failure as a Means to Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):969 - 978.
Laura Timonen & Vilma Luoma-aho (2010). Sector-Based Corporate Citizenship. Business Ethics 19 (1):1-13.
Christine A. Hemingway & Patrick W. Maclagan (2004). Managers' Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):33-44.
Guido Palazzo & Andreas Georg Scherer (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):71 - 88.
Irina Soboleva (2009). Internal CSR Practices. International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:237-260.
Elisabet Garriga & Domènec Melé (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71.
Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2006). Integrating Ethics All the Way Through: The Issue of Moral Agency Reconsidered. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2/3):233 - 239.
Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. van Buren Iii (2007). National Styles of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:253-268.
Added to index2012-03-15
Total downloads2 ( #232,211 of 548,977 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,977 )
How can I increase my downloads?