Context and background. Dreyfus and cognitive science
In W. Wrathall (ed.), Heidegger, Coping and Cognitive Science, Cambridge (2000)
|Abstract||In Hubert Dreyfus’s critique of artificial intelligence1, considerable importance is given to the matter of context –used here as a blanket term covering an immense and possibly heterogeneous phenomenon, which includes situation, background, circumstances, occasion and possibly more. Perhaps the best way to point to context in this most general sense is to proceed dialectically, and take as a first approximation context to be whatever is revealed as an obstacle whenever one attempts to account for mental dynamics on the formal model of a combinatorial game over families of interchangeable, fixed, self-standing – context-free as it were– elements. Dreyfus has argued persuasively that the human mind always ‘operates’, if that is the right word, within a setting which permeates whatever it is it operates on. Dreyfus’s thought on these matters was shaped during the years when artificial intelligence (AI) was at the height of early hopes and initial successes. This was also a period during which what was to become known as ‘cognitive science’ was little more than a ray of light falling on psychology..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Wrathall & Sean Kelly (1996). Existential Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy (4).
Christian Lotz (2007). Cognitivism and Practical Intentionality: A Critique of Dreyfus's Critique of Husserl. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):153-166.
Carleton B. Christensen (1998). Getting Heidegger Off the West Coast. Inquiry 41 (1):65 – 87.
Evan Selinger (2008). Collins's Incorrect Depiction of Dreyfus's Critique of Artificial Intelligence. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (2).
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1979). A Framework for Misrepresenting Knowledge. In Martin Ringle (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence. Humanities Press.
Michael Brownstein (2011). The Background, the Body and the Internet. Techné 15 (1):36-48.
Michael Wheeler (2008). Cognition in Context: Phenomenology, Situated Robotics and the Frame Problem. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):323 – 349.
Yoko Arisaka (1995). Heidegger's Theory of Space: A Critique of Dreyfus. Inquiry 38 (4):455 – 467.
David G. Stern (2000). Practices, Practical Holism, and Background Practices. In Mark Wrathall & Jeff Malpas (eds.), Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume 2. MIT Press.
Evan M. Selinger & Robert P. Crease (2002). Dreyfus on Expertise: The Limits of Phenomenological Analysis. Continental Philosophy Review 35 (3):245-279.
Jørgen W. Eriksen (2010). Mindless Coping in Competitive Sport: Some Implications and Consequences. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (1):66 – 86.
Setargew Kenaw (2008). Hubert L. Dreyfus's Critique of Classical AI and its Rationalist Assumptions. Minds and Machines 18 (2).
Zdravko Radman (ed.) (2012). Knowing Without Thinking: Mind, Action, Cognition and the Phenomenon of the Background. Palgrave Macmillan.
Anthony F. Beavers (2009). The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. Philosophical Psychology 22 (4):533-537.
Jonathan Webber (2002). Doing Without Representation: Coping with Dreyfus. Philosophical Explorations 5 (1):82-88.
Added to index2011-04-11
Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,359 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?