Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):95-95 (1999)
|Abstract||We argue that if a different definition of sentence complexity is adopted and processing capacity is assessed in a way that is consistent with that definition, then the Caplan & Waters distinction between interpretive versus postinterpretive processing is unnecessary insofar that it applies to the thematic role assignment in relative-clause sentences.|
|Keywords||C1 780108 Behavioural and cognitive sciences 380302 Linguistic Processes (incl. Speech Production and Comprehension)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert P. Mosteller, 'Testimonial' and the Formalistic Definition - the Case for an 'Accusatorial' Fix.
Jason Stanley (2003). Modality and What is Said. In John Hawthorne (ed.), Language and Mind. Blackwell.
Herman H. J. Kolk & Robert J. Hartsuiker (2000). Agrammatic Sentence Processing: Severity, Complexity, and Priming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):39-40.
Herbert G. Bohnert (1967). Communication by Ramsey-Sentence Clause. Philosophy of Science 34 (4):341-347.
Noriko H. Arai, Toniann Pitassi & Alasdair Urquhart (2006). The Complexity of Analytic Tableaux. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):777 - 790.
Matthew Haigh & Andrew J. Stewart (2011). The Influence of Clause Order, Congruency, and Probability on the Processing of Conditionals. Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):402 - 423.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #189,165 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?