Cyclicity in speech derived from call repetition rather than from intrinsic cyclicity of ingestion
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):513-514 (1998)
| Abstract | The jaw movements of speech are most probably derived from jaw movements associated with vocalisation. Cyclicity does not argue strongly for derivation from a cyclic pattern, because it arises readily in any system with feedback control. The appearance of regular repetition as a part of ritualisation of a display may have been important. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJeffrey L. Powell (2010). The Abyss of Repetition. Epoché 14 (2):363-382.
John J. Ohala (1998). Content First, Frame Later. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):525-526.
Roy Harris (2009). Freedom of Speech and Philosophy of Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (2):111 - 126.
Caleb Yong (2011). Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech? Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.
Irene Appelbaum (1999). The Dogma of Isomorphism: A Case Study From Speech Perception. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):S250-S259.
Lorna Clymer (ed.) (2006). Ritual, Routine and Regime: Repetition in Early Modern British and European Cultures. Published by the University of Toronto Press in Association with the Ucla Center for Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Studies and the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
