Journal of Philosophical Research 16:1-10 (1991)
|Abstract||Michael Levin, in Feminism and Freedom, argues that sex-stereotyping is inevitable and legitimate since there are innate non-anatomical differences between the sexes. He, further, believes that sex-stereotyping is compatible with members of both sexes acting freely and having equal opportunity in the job market and other areas of life. I will attack both claims, but I will particularly concentrate on the second one. I believe that Levin is only able to make his view sound plausible because of his minimal definitions of “freedom” and “equal opportunity” which I shall argue are not acceptable. The result of his mistake is that he presents us with a false dilemma: We must choose between either a Libertarian ideal---which includes freedom, equal opportunity, the inevitable sex-stereotyping and resulting patriarchal society (since it cannot be eliminated voluntarily)---and Feminism---which denies the legitimacy of sex-stereotyping, insists that unequal outcome means inequality of opportunity and so supports a quota system, and attempts to accomplish its aims, at great cost, by depriving people of freedom|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Harlan Beckley (2002). Capability as Opportunity: How Amartya Sen Revises Equal Opportunity. Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (1):107 - 135.
Clare Chambers (2009). Each Outcome is Another Opportunity: Problems with the Moment of Equal Opportunity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (4):374-400.
Beverley Shaw (1989). Sexual Discrimination and the Equal Opportunities Commission: Ought Schools to Eradicate Sex Stereotyping? Journal of Philosophy of Education 23 (2):295–302.
Louis M. Guenin (1997). Distributive Justice in Competitive Access to Intercollegiate Athletic Teams Segregated by Sex. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (4):347-372.
Alex Rajczi (2008). A Populist Argument for Same-Sex Marriage. The Monist 91 (3-4):475-505.
Martin van Hees (1998). On the Analysis of Negative Freedom. Theory and Decision 45 (2):175-197.
Alex Rajczi (2008). A Populist Argument for Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage. The Monist 91 (3/4):475-505.
Susan J. Brison (2006). Contentious Freedom: Sex Work and Social Construction. Hypatia 21 (4):192-200.
Patricia Vertinsky (1983). The Evolving Policy of Equal Curricular Opportunity in England: A Case Study of the Implementation of Sex Equality in Physical Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 31 (3):229 - 251.
Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu (1998). On Preference and Freedom. Theory and Decision 44 (2):173-198.
Karen Korabik (1990). Androgyny and Leadership Style. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (4-5):283 - 292.
Claudia Card (2000). Drucilla Cornell, At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality:At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality. Ethics 110 (3):607-609.
Alice H. Eagly & Wendy Wood (2005). Universal Sex Differences Across Patriarchal Cultures [Not Equal] Evolved Psychological Dispositions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):281-283.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads3 ( #213,130 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?