Graduate studies at Western
OUP USA (2007)
|Abstract||"The question for me is how can the human mind occur in the physical universe? We now know that the world is governed by physics. We now understand the way biology nestles comfortably within that. The issue is how will the mind do that as well?" Alan Newell, 4 December 1991, Carnegie Mellon University The argument John Anderson gives in this book was inspired by the passage above, from the last lecture by one of the pioneers of cognitive science. Alan Newell describes what, for him, is the pivotal question of scientific inquiry, and Anderson gives an answer that is emerging from the study of brain and behaviour. Humans share the same basic cognitive architecture with all primates, but they have evolved abilities to exercise abstract control over cognition and process more complex relational patterns. The human cognitive architecture consists of a set of largely independent modules associated with different brain regions. This book discusses in detail how these various modules can combine to produce behaviors as varied as driving a car and solving an algebraic equation, but focuses principally on two of the modules: the declarative and procedural. The declarative module involves a memory system that, moment by moment, attempts to give each person the most appropriate possible window into his or her past. The procedural module involves a central system that strives to develop a set of productions that will enable the most adaptive response from any state of the modules. Newell argued that the answer to his question must take the form of a cognitive architecture, and Anderson organizes his answer around the ACT-R architecture, but broadens it by bringing in research from all areas of cognitive science, including how recent work in brain imaging maps onto the cognitive architecture.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$13.33 used (76% off) $41.85 new (24% off) $46.75 direct from Amazon (15% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William P. Bechtel (1986). What Happens to Accounts of Mind-Brain Relations If We Forgo an Architecture of Rules and Representations? Philosophy of Science Association 1986:159 - 171.
Robert F. Hadley (1999). Connectionism and Novel Combinations of Skills: Implications for Cognitive Architecture. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 9 (2):197-221.
Bradford McCall (2011). What is Special About the Human Brain? By Richard Passingham and How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? By John R. Anderson. Heythrop Journal 52 (2):326-327.
Nagarjuna G. (2006). Layers in the Fabric of Mind: A Critical Review of Cognitive Ontogeny. In Jayashree Ramadas & Sugra Chunawala (eds.), Research Trends in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education. Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, TIFR.
Paul F. M. J. Verschure (2003). Real-World Behavior as a Constraint on the Cognitive Architecture: Comparing ACT-R and DAC in the Newell Test. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):624-626.
Camilo J. Cela-Conde & Gisèle Marty (1997). Mind Architecture and Brain Architecture. Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):327-340.
Wayne D. Gray, Michael J. Schoelles & Christopher W. Myers (2003). Meeting Newell's Other Challenge: Cognitive Architectures as the Basis for Cognitive Engineering. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):609-610.
Richard Samuels (2000). Massively Modular Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and Cognitive Architecture. In Peter Carruthers (ed.), Evolution and the Human Mind.
Richard P. Cooper (2006). Cognitive Architectures as Lakatosian Research Programs: Two Case Studies. Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):199-220.
Jack C. Lyons (2001). Carving the Mind at its (Not Necessarily Modular) Joints. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):277-302.
Richard Samuels (2006). Is the Human Mind Massively Modular? In Rod Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Blackwell.
Philip Gerrans & Valerie E. Stone (2008). Generous or Parsimonious Cognitive Architecture? Cognitive Neuroscience and Theory of Mind. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):121-141.
Dario D. Salvucci & Niels A. Taatgen (2011). Toward a Unified View of Cognitive Control. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):227-230.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads13 ( #95,713 of 740,563 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,535 of 740,563 )
How can I increase my downloads?