Look together: analyzing gaze coordination with epistemic network analysis

, , , &
Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01016

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conversation, Gaze Coordination, and Beliefs About Visual Context.Daniel C. Richardson, Rick Dale & John M. Tomlinson - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (8):1468-1482.
Using gaze patterns to predict task intent in collaboration.Chien-Ming Huang, Sean Andrist, Allison Sauppé & Bilge Mutlu - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Networked coordination: Effect of network structure human subjects' ability to solve coordination problem.Ramamohan Paturi, Mathew D. McCubbins & Nicholas Weller - unknown
Cognitive and Social Structure of the Elite Collaboration Network of Astrophysics: A Case Study on Shifting Network Structures. [REVIEW]Richard Heidler - 2011 - Minerva 49 (4):461-488.
Reverse Engineering Epistemic Evaluations.Sinan Dogramaci - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):513-530.
Interpersonal coordination and epistemic support for intentions with we-content.Olivier Roy - 2010 - Economics and Philosophy 26 (3):345-367.
The interactional use of eye-gaze in children with autism spectrum disorders.Terhi Korkiakangas & John Rae - 2014 - Interaction Studies 15 (2):233-259.
Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors.Todd Holloway, Miran Bozicevic & Katy Börner - 2007 - Complexity 12 (3):30-40.
Network analysis: Some basic principles.Barry Wellman - 1983 - Sociological Theory 1:155-200.
The emergence of the social brain network: Evidence from typical and atypical development.Mark H. Johnson & Leslie A. Tucker - unknown
Retracted article: Modern business ethics research: Concepts, theories, and relationships. [REVIEW]Hsing-Chau Tseng, Chi-Hsiang Duan, Hui-Lien Tung & Hsiang-Jui Kung - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 91 (4):587-597.
In Epistemic Networks, is Less Really More?Sarita Rosenstock, Cailin O'Connor & Justin Bruner - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (2):234-252.
Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co‐authorship teams.Katy Börner, Luca Dall'Asta, Weimao Ke & Alessandro Vespignani - 2005 - Complexity 10 (4):57-67.
Fashioned in nakedness, sculptured, and caused to be born: Bodies in light of the Sartrean gaze.Lisa Folkmarson Käll - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):61-81.
Review of Stephen Napier, Virtue Epistemology: Motivation and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Guy Axtell - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Using Language.Herbert H. Clark - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Grounding in communication.Herbert H. Clark & Susan E. Brennan - 1991 - In Lauren Resnick, Levine B., M. John, Stephanie Teasley & D. (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association. pp. 13--1991.
Why is conversation so easy?Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (1):8-11.

View all 9 references / Add more references