David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Nursing Ethics 6 (2):126-136 (1999)
For decades questionnaires have been used to measure the cognitive and psychological effects of prenatal genetic testing, but little is known about why some women undergo testing and others decline. Research indicates that many factors influence decision making, including values and beliefs. What is often denied rather than recognized is that the professional and personal values and beliefs held by the health care provider influence the patient’s decision. It is assumed that, if genetic services are delivered in a nondirective manner, patients will not be affected by the provider’s personal and professional standpoint. The qualitative research data reported here challenge this assumption. Getting to know patients’ moral understanding and patterns of ethical reasoning by listening to their personal stories is recommended as a better way for nurses to help patients to make informed and autonomous decisions about prenatal genetic screening or diagnostic tests
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Elisabeth Hildt (2009). Predictive Genetic Testing, Autonomy and Responsibility for Future Health. Medicine Studies 1 (2):143-153.
Similar books and articles
Sonia M. Suter (1998). Value Neutrality and Nondirectiveness: Comments on "Future Directions in Genetic Counseling". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):161-163.
Timothy F. Murphy (2014). In Defense of Prenatal Genetic Interventions. Bioethics 28 (7):335-342.
Arthur Zucker (1981). Holism and Reductionism: A View From Genetics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):145-164.
Wolfgang Balzer & Pablo Lorenzano (2000). The Logical Structure of Classical Genetics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (2):243-266.
J. Arlebrink (1997). The Moral Roots of Prenatal Diagnosis. Ethical Aspects of the Early Introduction and Presentation of Prenatal Diagnosis in Sweden. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):260-261.
Carveth Read (1882). The Mnemonic Lines of the Syllogism. Mind 7 (27):440-442.
Russell E. Vance (1996). Heroic Antireductionism and Genetics: A Tale of One Science. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):45.
Adam Ferner (2011). Read Between the Germ Lines. The Philosophers' Magazine 53 (53):110-111.
Susana Pinar (2002). The Emergence of Modern Genetics in Spain and the Effects of the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) on Its Development. Journal of the History of Biology 35 (1):111 - 148.
A. Lindenmayer & N. Simon (1980). The Formal Structure of Genetics and the Reduction Problem. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:160 - 170.
Huiyuhl Yi (2012). Brueckner and Fischer on the Evil of Death. Philosophia 40 (2):295-303.
N. Hallowell, S. Cooke, G. Crawford, A. Lucassen, M. Parker & C. Snowdon (2009). An Investigation of Patients' Motivations for Their Participation in Genetics-Related Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1):37-45.
Thomas Tomlinson (1986). The Physician's Influence on Patients' Choices. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Dagmar Schmitz (2013). A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
A. S. (2001). The Gene Genie: Good Fairy or Wicked Witch? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):723-739.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads6 ( #217,583 of 1,139,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,515 of 1,139,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?