Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (3):141-170 (2010)
|Abstract||Although ‘glue semantics’ is the most extensively developed theory of semantic composition for LFG, it is not very well integrated into the LFG projection architecture, due to the absence of a simple and well-explained correspondence between glue-proofs and f-structures. In this paper I will show that we can improve this situation with two steps: (1) Replace the current quantificational formulations of glue (either Girard’s system F, or first order linear logic) with strictly propositional linear logic (the quantifier, unit and exponential free version of either MILL or ILL, depending on whether or not tensors are used). (2) Reverse the direction of the standard σ-projection from f-structure to meaning, giving one going from the (atomic nodes of) the glue-proof to the f-structure, rather than from the f-structure to a ‘semantic projection’ which is itself somehow related to the glue-proof. As a side effect, the standard semantic projection of LFG glue semantics can be dispensed with. A result is that LFG sentence structures acquire a level composed of strictly binary trees, constructed out of nodes representing function application and lambda abstraction, with a significant resemblance to external and internal merge in the Minimalist Program. This increased resemblance between frameworks might assist in making useful comparisons|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Miltiadis Kokkonidis (2008). First-Order Glue. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (1).
Ash Asudeh (2005). Relational Nouns, Pronouns, and Resumption. Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (4):375 - 446.
Mark Johnson (1999). A Resource Sensitive Interpretation of Lexical Functional Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (1):45-81.
Ray Paton (1997). Glue, Verb and Text Metaphors in Biology. Acta Biotheoretica 45 (1).
Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides (2011). Reasoning Dynamically About What One Says. Synthese 183 (S1):5-31.
Andrei Rodin (2004). The Vessels and the Glue: Space, Time, and Causation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):633-634.
Mary Dalrymple, John Lamping, Fernando Pereira & Vijay Saraswat (1997). Quantifiers, Anaphora, and Intensionality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (3):219-273.
Michela Ippolito (2006). Semantic Composition and Presupposition Projection in Subjunctive Conditionals. Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (6):631 - 672.
Andreas Stokke (2013). Protagonist Projection. Mind and Language 28 (2):204-232.
P. J. E. Kail (2007/2010). Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Frederick M. Kronz (1991). Quantum Entanglement and Nonideal Measurements: A Critique of Margenau's Objections to the Projection Postulate. Synthese 89 (2):229 - 251.
David Kirsh (2009). Projection, Problem Space and Anchoring. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society:2310-2315.
Added to index2011-02-03
Total downloads17 ( #70,994 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?