Graduate studies at Western
Res Publica 17 (3):291-296 (2011)
|Abstract||Timothy Michael Fowler has argued that, as a consequence of their commitment to neutrality in regard to comprehensive doctrines, political liberals face a dilemma. In essence, the dilemma for political liberals is that either they have to give up their commitment to neutrality (which is an indispensible part of their view), or they have to allow harm to children. Fowler’s case for this dilemma depends on ascribing to political liberals a view which grants parents a great degree of freedom in deciding on the education of their children. I show that ascribing this view to political liberals rests upon a misinterpretation of political liberalism. Since political liberals have access to reasons based upon the interests of children, they need not yield to parent’s wishes about the education of their children. A correct understanding of political liberalism thus shows that political liberals do not face the dilemma envisaged by Fowler|
|Keywords||Political liberalism Neutrality Education The good|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Timothy Fowler (2010). The Problems of Liberal Neutrality in Upbringing. Res Publica 16 (4):367-381.
Roger Paden (1999). Political Arguments Against Utopianism. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (1):7-17.
Clare Chambers (2004). Are Breast Implants Better Than Female Genital Mutilation? Autonomy, Gender Equality and Nussbaum's Political Liberalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (3):1-33.
Robert Westmoreland (2011). Realizing Â€˜Politicalâ€™ Neutrality. Law and Philosophy 30 (5):541-573.
Enrico Zoffoli (2012). The Place of Comprehensive Doctrines in Political Liberalism: On Some Common Misgivings About the Subject and Function of the Overlapping Consensus. Res Publica 18 (4):351-366.
Jason Brennan & John Tomasi (forthcoming). Classical Liberalism. In David Estlund (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Jon Mahoney (2004). Public Reason and the Moral Foundation of Liberalism. Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):311-331.
Michael S. Merry (2007). The Well-Being of Children, the Limits of Paternalism, and the State: Can Disparate Interests Be Reconciled? Ethics and Education 2 (1):39-59.
Christie Hartley & Lori Watson (2012). Political Liberalism, Marriage and the Family. Law and Philosophy 31 (2):185-212.
Colin Farrelly (1999). Public Reason, Neutrality and Civic Virtues. Ratio Juris 12 (1):11-25.
Roger Paden (1997). Consumerism, the Procedural Republic, and the Unencumbered Self. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1/2):33-40.
Matthew B. O'Brien (2012). Why Liberal Neutrality Prohibits Same-Sex Marriage: Rawls, Political Liberalism, and the Family. British Journal of American Legal Studies 1 (2):411-466.
Alan Carter (2006). Political Liberalism and Political Compliance: Part 2 of the Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):135-157.
Added to index2011-05-14
Total downloads29 ( #48,285 of 752,086 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 752,086 )
How can I increase my downloads?