Res Publica 11 (4):349-369 (2005)
|Abstract||Pressuring someone into having sex would seem to differ in significant ways from pressuring someone into investing in one’s business or buying an expensive bauble. In affirming this claim, I take issue with a recent essay by Sarah Conly (‘Seduction, Rape, and Coercion’, Ethics, October 2004), who thinks that pressuring into sex can be helpfully evaluated by analogy to these other instances of using pressure. Drawing upon work by Alan Wertheimer, the leading theorist of coercion, she argues that so long as pressuring does not amount to coercing someone into having sex, her consent to sex answers the important ethical questions about it. In this essay, I argue that to understand the real significance of pressuring into sex, we need to appeal to background considerations, especially the male-dominant gender hierarchy, which renders sexual pressuring different from its non-sexual analogues. Treating pressure to have sex like any other sort of interpersonal pressure obscures the role such sexual pressure might play in supporting gender hierarchy, and fails to explain why pressure by men against women is more problematic than pressure by women against men. I suggest that men pressuring women to have sex differs from the reverse case because of at least two factors: (1) gendered social institutions which add to the pressures against women, and (2) the greater likelihood that men, not women, will use violence if denied, and the lesser ability of women compared to men to resist such violence without harm|
|Keywords||coercion gender hierarchy gender oppression pressure rape Sarah Conly seduction sex|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Marshall Townsend (1998). Dominance, Sexual Activity, and Sexual Emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):386-386.
John Marshall Townsend (1999). Extraversion, Sexual Experience, and Sexual Emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):537-537.
Marshall Schminke & Maureen L. Ambrose (1997). Asymmetric Perceptions of Ethical Frameworks of Men and Women in Business and Nonbusiness Settings. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (7):719-729.
Peter Frost (1998). Sex Differences May Indeed Exist for 3-D Navigational Abilities: But Was Sexual Selection Responsible? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):443-444.
Peg O'Connor (1997). Warning! Contents Under Heterosexual Pressure. Hypatia 12 (3):183 - 188.
Mari Mikkola (2011). Ontological Commitments, Sex and Gender. In Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics. Springer.
Stephen Beckerman (1999). Violence, Sex, and the Good Mother. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):215-216.
János M. Réthelyi & Mária S. Kopp (2004). Hierarchy Disruption: Women and Men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):305-307.
Karen J. Maher & Jeffrey J. Bailey (1999). The Effects of Transgressor Sex on Judgments of Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):157 - 171.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #20,825 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,054 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?