The Demands of Deontology Are Not So Paradoxical

Journal of Philosophical Research 16:407-410 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The “paradox of deontology” depends partly upon ignoring the special responsibility each person has for her own actions, and partly upon ignoring the essential differences between refraining from X and persuading another to refrain. But only in part; the paradoxical situations schematized by Shaw can occasionally occur. When they do, his pragmatic defense of deontology is sound.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Paradox of Deontology.William H. Shaw - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:393-406.
Deontology and defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
Deontology.Stephen L. Darwall (ed.) - 2003 - Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Agent-neutral deontology.Tom Dougherty - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):527-537.
In defense of deontology and Kant: A reply to Van staveren.Mark D. White - 2009 - Review of Political Economy 21 (2):315-323.
The practice of medical ethics: A structuralistic approach.William J. Ellos - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (3).
A paradox for weak deontology.Michael Huemer - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (4):464-477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
85 (#191,991)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Judith Andre
Michigan State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references