The fundamental disagreement between luck egalitarians and relational egalitarians

In Colin Murray Macleod (ed.), Justice and Equality. University of Calgary Press. pp. 1-23 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Choice and Luck in Recent Egalitarian Thought.Timothy Hinton - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (2):145-167.
Holding people responsible for what they do not control.Zofia Stemplowska - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):355-377.
The Incompleteness of Luck Egalitarianism.Ryan Long - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:87-96.
Equality versus priority: A misleading distinction.Daniel M. Hausman - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):229-238.
What do you mean I should take responsibility for my own ill health.Nicole A. Vincent - 2009 - Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):39-51.
Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care About Distributions.Christian Schemmel - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):365-390.
Luck Egalitarianism: Equality, Responsibility, and Justice.Carl Knight - 2009 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Luck Egalitarianism Interpretated and Defended.Richard J. Arneson - 2004 - Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2):1-20.
Genes and equality.Colin Farrelly - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):587-592.
Why Egalitarians Should Not Care About Equality.Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):507 - 519.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-25

Downloads
157 (#111,583)

6 months
1 (#1,028,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Anderson
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references