Thinking outside the Embryo: The Superorganism as a Model for EvoDevo Studies

Biological Theory 2 (4):398-408 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditional model systems such as fly, mouse, and chick have formed the foundation of the EvoDevo research program. These animal systems have provided a wealth of information on the patterns and mechanisms of developmental change over large phylogenetic scales. However, the almost exclusive focus on individual embryos as model organisms has also limited the field’s ability to address the central roles that natural selection and life history adaptation play in the evolution of developmental systems. Likewise, focus on this small set of “unitary” model organisms may also constrain the explanatory reach and theoretical robustness of EvoDevo if we consider that many core developmental processes like homeostatic regulation, ontogenetic differentiation, and norms of reaction are also manifest at other levels of biological organization, such as colonial organisms. The study of social insect systems can help bridge these considerable gaps in EvoDevo’s current approach. Because social insect colonies span the fine line between simple associations of “unitary” organisms and full-fledged “superorganisms,” these systems help elucidate what kinds of processes fundamentally characterize developmental systems and their evolution. What is more, the traits of social insect colonies show high degrees of population-level variability that can be linked directly to selective factors in the environment, making them ideal systems in which to more fully integrate EcoEvoDevo approaches

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The potential of the human embryo.Mark T. Brown - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (6):585 – 618.
The Problem with the Problem of the Embryo.Bernard G. Prusak - 2008 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3):503-521.
The embryo in relationships: A French debate on stem cell research.Giovanni Maio - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):583 – 602.
Testing my own morality.Massimo Pigliucci - 2012 - Philosophy Now 91 (Jul/Aug):41-41.
Embryo loss and double effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):537-540.
The morality of embryo use.Louis M. Guenin - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
A Consumer's Guide to Superorganisms.Michael T. Ghiselin - 2011 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (2):152-167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
26 (#577,276)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection: How shall we name and generalize the unit of Darwinism?Stephen Jay Gould & Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1999 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96 (21):11904-09.
Kin selection as the key to altruism: its rise and fall.Edward O. Wilson - 2005 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 72 (1):1-8.
Origins and the EcoEvoDevo Problem.Marion Blute - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (2):116-118.

Add more references