Why bush should explain 11 september
| Abstract | There were various initial reactions to the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, and among those reactions were some contradictions. There were those who demanded an explanation for the attacks, and others who condemned attempts to explain as immoral or unpatriotic. Though President George W. Bush did make some rhetorical remarks that, I believe, masqueraded as explanatory, it appears that he agrees with the latter set. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesMoshe Goldberger (2004). September 11 and You. Distributed by Feldheim.
Bruce Lincoln (2006). Holy Terrors: Thinking About Religion After September 11. University of Chicago Press.
Kristin Andrews (2006). Explaining Terrorism. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:167-171.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #100,762 of 556,772 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,754 of 556,772 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
