Graduate studies at Western
Logica Universalis 3 (2):153-218 (2009)
|Abstract||My purpose here is purely historical. It is not an attempt to resolve the question as to whether Russell did or did not countenance nonclassical logics, and if so, which nonclassical logics, and still less to demonstrate whether he himself contributed, in any manner, to the development of nonclassical logic. Rather, I want merely to explore and insofar as possible document, whether, and to what extent, if any, Russell interacted with the various, either the various candidates or their, ideas that Dejnožka and others have proposed as potentially influential in Russell’s intellectual reactions to nonclassical logic or to the philosophical concepts that might contribute to his reactions to nonclassical logics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nino B. Cocchiarella (2000). Russell's Paradox of the Totality of Propositions. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (1):25-37.
Katalin Bimbó (2007). Functorial Duality for Ortholattices and de Morgan Lattices. Logica Universalis 1 (2):311-333.
Greg Restall (forthcoming). Substructural Logics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Lorenzo Peña (1992). Algunas aplicaciones filosóficas de las lógicas multivalentes. Theoria 7 (1/2/3):141-163.
Helena Rasiowa (1974). An Algebraic Approach to Non-Classical Logics. Warszawa,Pwn - Polish Scientific Publishers.
Susan Haack (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge University Press.
Greg Restall (1997). Combining Possibilities and Negations. Studia Logica 59 (1):121-141.
Luca Viganò (2000). Labelled Non-Classical Logics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Added to index2009-08-08
Total downloads27 ( #51,760 of 739,080 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,080 )
How can I increase my downloads?