Russell and his sources for non-classical logics
Logica Universalis 3 (2) (2009)
| Abstract | My purpose here is purely historical. It is not an attempt to resolve the question as to whether Russell did or did not countenance nonclassical logics, and if so, which nonclassical logics, and still less to demonstrate whether he himself contributed, in any manner, to the development of nonclassical logic. Rather, I want merely to explore and insofar as possible document, whether, and to what extent, if any, Russell interacted with the various, either the various candidates or their, ideas that Dejnožka and others have proposed as potentially influential in Russell’s intellectual reactions to nonclassical logic or to the philosophical concepts that might contribute to his reactions to nonclassical logics. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNino B. Cocchiarella (2000). Russell's Paradox of the Totality of Propositions. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (1):25-37.
Katalin Bimbó (2007). Functorial Duality for Ortholattices and de Morgan Lattices. Logica Universalis 1 (2).
Lorenzo Peña (1992). Algunas aplicaciones filosóficas de las lógicas multivalentes. Theoria 7 (1/2/3):141-163.
Helena Rasiowa (1974). An Algebraic Approach to Non-Classical Logics. Warszawa,Pwn - Polish Scientific Publishers.
Susan Haack (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge University Press.
Greg Restall (1997). Combining Possibilities and Negations. Studia Logica 59 (1):121-141.
Luca Viganò (2000). Labelled Non-Classical Logics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-08-08Total downloads26 ( #47,662 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
