No supreme principle: Confucianism's harmonization of multiple values
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (1):35-40 (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert B. Louden (2003). Samuel J. Kerstein, Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality:Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Ethics 113 (4):885-887.
Wenhua Chai (2006). Traditional Confucianism in Modern China: Ma Yifu's Ethical Thought. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):366-381.
William Theodore De Bary & Irene Bloom (eds.) (1979). Principle and Practicality: Essays in Neo-Confucianism and Practical Learning. Columbia University Press.
Samuel J. Kerstein (2002). Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Gideon Rosen (2009). Might Kantian Contractualism Be the Supreme Principle of Morality? Ratio 22 (1):78-97.
Qingping Liu (2003). Filiality Versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism". Philosophy East and West 53 (2):234-250.
Lin Hang (2011). Traditional Confucianism and its Contemporary Relevance. Asian Philosophy 21 (4):437 - 445.
Heiner Roetz (2008). Confucianism Between Tradition and Modernity, Religion, and Secularization: Questions to Tu Weiming. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (4):367-380.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,092 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
