Feminist Ethics: Defeating the Why-Be-Moral Skeptic
Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (2):59-86 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSamantha Brennan (1999). Reconciling Feminist Politics and Feminist Ethics on the Issue of Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 30 (2):260–275.
Anita M. Superson (2000). Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics Margaret Urban Walker New York: Routledge, 1998, Xiii + 251 P. Dialogue 39 (01):208-.
Sally E. Talbot (2000). Partial Reason: Critical and Constructive Transformations of Ethics and Epistemology. Greenwood Press.
Susan J. Hekman (1995). Moral Voices, Moral Selves: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Anita M. Superson (1990). The Self-Interest Based Contractarian Response to the Why-Be-Moral Skeptic. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):427-447.
William Throop (1998). Defeating the Skeptic. Philosophia 26 (3-4):321-336.
Lisa Tessman (2011). The Moral Skeptic. By Anita Superson. Hypatia 26 (4):883-887.
Neera K. Badhwar (2010). Superson, Anita M. The Moral Skeptic . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 . Pp. 250. $24.95 (Paper). Ethics 120 (3):635-639.
P. Bloomfield (2011). The Moral Skeptic, by Anita M. Superson. Mind 120 (479):914-917.
Anita M. Superson (2009). The Moral Skeptic. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 549,753 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,753 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
