Consistent, independent, and distinct propositions. II
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (1):135-136 (1976)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAnjan Shukla (1972). Consistent, Independent, and Distinct Propositions. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (3):399-406.
Anjan Shukla (1983). Consistent, Independent, and Distinct Propositions. III. Modalities in ${\Rm S}6$. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (1):141-142.
Francesco Berto (2010). Impossible Worlds and Propositions: Against the Parity Thesis. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):471-486.
Dale Jacquette (2006). Propositions, Sets, and Worlds. Studia Logica 82 (3):337 - 343.
Rod Bertolet (1991). Elementary Prepositions, Independence, and Pictures. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:53-61.
Kevin C. Klement, Russell-Myhill Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jeff Speaks (2009). Transparency, Intentionalism, and the Nature of Perceptual Content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):539-573.
Robert T. Lehe (1998). Realism and Reality. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:219-237.
José L. Zalabardo (2010). The Tractatus on Logical Consequence. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):425-442.
John L. Bell & William Demopoulos (1996). Elementary Propositions and Independence. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37 (1):112-124.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-08-24Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
