Graduate studies at Western
Journal of the History of Biology 33 (2):315 - 347 (2000)
|Abstract||The so-called "biometric-Mendelian controversy" has received much attention from science studies scholars. This paper focuses on one scientist involved in this debate, Arthur Dukinfield Darbishire, who performed a series of hybridization experiments with mice beginning in 1901. Previous historical work on Darbishire's experiments and his later attempt to reconcile Mendelian and biometric views describe Darbishire as eventually being "converted" to Mendelism. I provide a new analysis of this episode in the context of Darbishire's experimental results, his underlying epistemology, and his influence on the broader debate surrounding the rediscovery and acceptance of Mendelism. I investigate various historiographical issues raised by this episode in order to reflect on the idea of "conversion" to a scientific theory. Darbishire was an influential figure who resisted strong forces compelling him to convert prematurely due to his requirements that the new theory account for particularly important anomalous facts and answer the most pressing questions in the field.|
|Keywords||Mendelism biometry biometric-Mendelian controversy genetics mice breeding experiments conversion theory change epistemology of science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Margaret Morrison (2002). Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):39-68.
J. E. Sandys (1893). H. D. Darbishire. The Classical Review 7 (08):372-373.
H. D. Darbishire (1892). Abnormal Derivations. The Classical Review 6 (04):147-149.
F. W. Thomas & H. D. Darbishire (1892). Further Discussion on the Forms of the Negative Ne. The Classical Review 6 (05):194-195.
H. D. Darbishire (1893). The Göttingen School of Comparative Philology. The Classical Review 7 (08):337-340.
Christophe Bonneuil (2006). Mendelism, Plant Breeding and Experimental Cultures: Agriculture and the Development of Genetics in France. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 39 (2):281 - 308.
H. D. Darbishire (1891). Paul's History of Language Hermann Paul's Principles of the History of Language, Translated by H. A. Strong, M. A., LL.D. Sonnenscbein: 10s. 6d. New Edition, 1890. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (08):387-.
H. D. Darbishire (1891). Wharton's Etyma Latina Etyma Latina, by E. R. Wharton, M.A. Pp. Xxxiv. And 152. Rivingtons, 1890. 7s. 6d. The Classical Review 5 (05):217-220.
H. D. Darbishire (1892). Fennell's Indo-European Vowel-System Indo-European Vowel-System, by C. A. M. Fennell, D. Litt. 33 Pp. The Classical Review 6 (1-2):56-58.
Paul S. MacDonald (1997). Philosophical Conversion. Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):303-327.
James Tabery (2004). The "Evolutionary Synthesis" of George Udny Yule. Journal of the History of Biology 37 (1):73 - 101.
Michael Cholbi (2011). The Moral Conversion of Rational Egoists. Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):533-556.
Conway Zirkle (1968). The Role of Liberty Hyde Bailey and Hugo de Vries in the Rediscovery of Mendelism. Journal of the History of Biology 1 (2):205 - 218.
Aaron C. T. Smith & Bob Stewart (2011). Becoming Believers: Studying the Conversion Process From Within. Zygon 46 (4):806-834.
Jonathan Hodge (2011). Darwinism After Mendelism: The Case of Sewall Wright's Intellectual Synthesis in His Shifting Balance Theory of Evolution (1931). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (1):30-39.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 739,392 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,392 )
How can I increase my downloads?