Marvelling at the Marvel: The Supposed Conversion of A. D. Darbishire to Mendelism [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Biology 33 (2):315 - 347 (2000)
Abstract
The so-called "biometric-Mendelian controversy" has received much attention from science studies scholars. This paper focuses on one scientist involved in this debate, Arthur Dukinfield Darbishire, who performed a series of hybridization experiments with mice beginning in 1901. Previous historical work on Darbishire's experiments and his later attempt to reconcile Mendelian and biometric views describe Darbishire as eventually being "converted" to Mendelism. I provide a new analysis of this episode in the context of Darbishire's experimental results, his underlying epistemology, and his influence on the broader debate surrounding the rediscovery and acceptance of Mendelism. I investigate various historiographical issues raised by this episode in order to reflect on the idea of "conversion" to a scientific theory. Darbishire was an influential figure who resisted strong forces compelling him to convert prematurely due to his requirements that the new theory account for particularly important anomalous facts and answer the most pressing questions in the field.
Keywords Mendelism  biometry  biometric-Mendelian controversy  genetics  mice breeding experiments  conversion  theory change  epistemology of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Charles H. Pence (2011). “Describing Our Whole Experience”: The Statistical Philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):475-485.
    Similar books and articles
    J. E. Sandys (1893). H. D. Darbishire. The Classical Review 7 (08):372-373.
    H. D. Darbishire (1892). Abnormal Derivations. The Classical Review 6 (04):147-149.
    Paul S. MacDonald (1997). Philosophical Conversion. Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):303-327.
    James Tabery (2004). The "Evolutionary Synthesis" of George Udny Yule. Journal of the History of Biology 37 (1):73 - 101.
    Michael Cholbi (2011). The Moral Conversion of Rational Egoists. Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):533-556.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-05-29

    Total downloads

    5 ( #178,728 of 1,088,374 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,936 of 1,088,374 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.