David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Theory 40 (3):295–323 (2001)
Forgetting has rarely been investigated in historical theory. Insofar as it attracted the attention of theorists at all, forgetting has ordinarily been considered to be a defect in our relationship to the past that should be overcome in one way or another. The only exception is Nietzsche who so provocatively sung the praises of forgetting in his On the Use and Abuse of History . But Nietzsche's conception is the easy victim of a consistent historicism and therefore in need of correction. Four types of forgetting are identified in this essay. Central in the essay's argument is the fourth type. This is the kind of forgetting taking place when a civilization "commits suicide" by exchanging a previous identity for a new one. Hegel's moving account of the conflict between Socrates and the Athenian state is presented as the paradigmatic example of this kind of forgetting. Two conclusions follow from an analysis of this type of forgetting. First, we can now understand what should be recognized as a civilization's historical sublime and how the notions of the historical sublime and of collective trauma are related. Second, it follows that myth and history do not exclude each other; on the contrary, history creates myth. This should not be taken to be a defect of history, for this is precisely how it should be
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jörn Rüsen (2004). How to Overcome Ethnocentrism: Approaches to a Culture of Recognition by History in the Twenty‐First Century1. History and Theory 43 (4):118-129.
Similar books and articles
E. Ladavas, Anna Berti & A. Farne (2000). Dissociation Between Conscious and Non-Conscious Processing in Neglect. In Yves Rossetti & Antti Revonsuo (eds.), Beyond Dissociation: Interaction Between Dissociated Implicit and Explicit Processing. John Benjamins. 175-193.
Angela Woods (2011). The Sublime Object of Psychiatry: Schizophrenia in Clinical and Cultural Theory. Oxford University Press, Usa.
Madan M. Bhalla & D. Proffitt (2000). Geographical Slant Perception: Dissociation and Coordination Between Explicit Awareness and Visually Guided Actions. In Yves Rossetti & Antti Revonsuo (eds.), Beyond Dissociation: Interaction Between Dissociated Implicit and Explicit Processing. John Benjamins.
Jerome Carroll (2008). The Limits of the Sublime, the Sublime of Limits: Hermeneutics as a Critique of the Postmodern Sublime. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):171–181.
Timothy M. Costelloe (ed.) (2012). The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge University Press.
Tadeusz Rachwal & Tadeusz Slawek (eds.) (1994). The Most Sublime Act: Essays on the Sublime. Wydawnictwo Universytetu Śląskiego.
F. R. Ankersmit (2005). Sublime Historical Experience. Stanford University Press.
Kiene Brillenburg Wurth (2007). The Musicality of the Past: Sehnsucht, Trauma, and the Sublime. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (2):219-247.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #116,137 of 1,696,586 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #142,346 of 1,696,586 )
How can I increase my downloads?