Aristotle on the fallacies of combination and division in Sophistici Elenchi 4
History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2):111-129 (2003)
| Abstract | This paper discusses the fallacies of combination and division as they are presented by Aristotle in chapter 4 of his Sophistici Elenchi. Aristotle's examples are concise, their discussion is unclear, and it is difficult to distinguish the cases of combination from those of division. I analyse the Aristotelian examples and the interpretations offered so far. I show that these interpretations suffer from a major defect: they fail to identify a common characteristic whereby the Aristotelian examples can be classified as instances of combination or division. In my reconstruction of the examples, I repair this deficiency: I give a single pattern of explanation for the fallacy of combination and another (similar) pattern for the fallacy of division. Thus, it is possible to free Aristotle from the following charges: (i) he did not clearly distinguish between combination and division, and (ii) he reduced combination and division to a single fallacy. My explanation of the fallacies uses the notion of scope of an expression: in modern terminology, the fallacy of combination can be described as ?fallacy of the wide scope?, the fallacy of division as ?fallacy of the narrow scope? | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. Ritola (2001). Wilson on Circular Arguments. Argumentation 15 (3):295-312.
Christopher W. Tindale (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.
Douglas Walton (1999). Rethinking the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization. Argumentation 13 (2):161-182.
Hugh Tredennick (1961). Aristotle: Topica and Sophistici Elenchi W. D. Ross: Aristotelis Topica Et Sophistici Elenchi. (Script. Class. Bibl. Oxon.) Pp. Viii+260. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958. Cloth, 25s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 11 (01):33-34.
Erik C. W. Krabbe (1998). Who is Afraid of Figure of Speech? Argumentation 12 (2):281-294.
David Botting (2012). Fallacies of Accident. Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads5 ( #160,428 of 549,118 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,118 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
