Be known, be available, be mutual: A qualitative ethical analysis of social values in rural palliative care
Graduate studies at Western
BMC Medical Ethics (1):19- (2011)
|Abstract||Background: Although attention to healthcare ethics in rural areas has increased, specific focus on rural palliative care is still largely under-studied and under-theorized. The purpose of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the values informing good palliative care from rural individuals' perspectives. Methods: We conducted a qualitative ethnographic study in four rural communities in Western Canada. Each community had a population of 10, 000 or less and was located at least a three hour travelling distance by car from a specialist palliative care treatment centre. Data were collected over a 2-year period and included 95 interviews, 51 days of field work and 74 hours of direct participant observation where the researchers accompanied rural healthcare providers. Data were analyzed inductively to identify the most prevalent thematic values, and then coded using NVivo. Results: This study illuminated the core values of knowing and being known, being present and available, and community and mutuality that provide the foundation for ethically good rural palliative care. These values were congruent across the study communities and across the stakeholders involved in rural palliative care. Although these were highly prized values, each came with a corresponding ethical tension. Being known often resulted in a loss of privacy. Being available and present created a high degree of expectation and potential caregiver strain. The values of community and mutuality created entitlement issues, presenting daunting challenges for coordinated change. Conclusions: The values identified in this study offer the opportunity to better understand common ethical tensions that arise in rural healthcare and key differences between rural and urban palliative care. In particular, these values shed light on problematic health system and health policy changes. When initiatives violate deeply held values and hard won rural capacity to address the needs of their dying members is undermined, there are long lasting negative consequences. The social fabric of rural life is frayed. These findings offer one way to re-conceptualize healthcare decision making through consideration of critical values to support ethically good palliative care in rural settings|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barbara Pesut, Joan L. Bottorff & Carole A. Robinson (2011). Be Known, Be Available, Be Mutual: A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Social Values in Rural Palliative Care. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):19-.
William Nelson, Gili Lushkov, Andrew Pomerantz & William B. Weeks (2006). Rural Health Care Ethics: Is There a Literature? American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):44 – 50.
H. ten Have & David Clark (eds.) (2002). The Ethics of Palliative Care: European Perspectives. Open University Press.
Fiona Randall (1996). Palliative Care Ethics: A Good Companion. Oxford University Press.
Maaike A. Hermsen & Henk A. M. J. ten Have (2003). Moral Problems in Palliative Care Practice: A Qualitative Study. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):263-272.
H. Colby William, John Lantos Constance Dahlin & Myra Christopher John Carney (forthcoming). The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Domain 8: Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care. HEC Forum.
William Colby, Constance Dahlin, John Lantos, John Carney & Myra Christopher (2010). The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Clinical Practice Guidelines Domain 8: Ethical and Legal Aspects of Care. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 22 (2):117-131.
Fiona Randall (2006). The Philosophy of Palliative Care: Critique and Reconstruction. Oxford University Press.
Y. Tony Yang & Margaret M. Mahon (2012). Palliative Care for the Terminally Ill in America: The Consideration of QALYs, Costs, and Ethical Issues. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):411-416.
Kathryn E. Artnak, Richard M. McGraw & Vayden F. Stanley (2011). Health Care Accessibility for Chronic Illness Management and End-of-Life Care: A View From Rural America. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):140-155.
Barbara Pesut, Frances Beswick, Carole A. Robinson & Joan L. Bottorff (2012). Philosophizing Social Justice in Rural Palliative Care: Hayek's Moral Stone? Nursing Philosophy 13 (1):46-55.
William Nelson, Marie-Claire Rosenberg, Todd Mackenzie & William Weeks (2010). The Presence of Ethics Programs in Critical Access Hospitals. HEC Forum 22 (4):267-274.
T. W. Kirk (2011). The Meaning, Limitations and Possibilities of Making Palliative Care a Public Health Priority by Declaring It a Human Right. Public Health Ethics 4 (1):84-92.
Anne Moates (2005). The Rural Urban Health Divide. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 11 (1):4.
Peter A. Ubel (1999). The Challenge of Measuring Community Values in Ways Appropriate for Setting Health Care Priorities. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (3):263-284.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads4 ( #190,208 of 757,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 757,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?