Platon le sceptique

Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 95 (2):267 - 291 (1990)
The article discusses the sceptical New Academy's interpretation of Plato as a sceptic. The first part discusses Arcesilaus' reintroduction of Socratic method, and the reading of the Socratic dialogues and the Theaetetus implied by this. The second part discusses arguments probably used by the later, more moderate Academy for a reading of Plato's more dogmatic dialogues in a way consistent with scepticism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,037
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Carlos Lévy (1990). Platon, Arcésilas, Carnéade Réponse à J. Annas. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 95 (2):293-306.
Terence Irwin (1995). Plato's Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Marisa Diaz-Waian & J. Angelo Corlett (2012). Kraut and Annas on Plato. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):157-195.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

21 ( #188,814 of 1,934,364 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #91,777 of 1,934,364 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.