Pragmatist Governance: Re-Imagining Institutions and Democracy
OUP USA (2011)
| Abstract | Barack Obama is often lauded as a 'pragmatist,' yet when most people employ the term, they mean it in the vaguest sense: that he's practical and willing to compromise to get things done. However, the public philosophy of pragmatism, which has been the subject of a rich revival in the past couple of decades, is far more than this. First developed in the late nineteenth century, pragmatism is primarily a way of thinking--an anti-dualist philosophy that attempts to overcome the dichotomies between self and object, nature and culture, mind and body, theory and practice, and fact and value. When applied to governance, pragmatists advocate the use of tactics like third party mediation and problem-solving to achieve anti-dualist principles: cosmopolitan localism, analytical holism, progressive conservatism, and processual structuralism. In Pragmatist Governance, Chris Ansell begins with a theory of the concept and then explains why the approach is ideal for addressing today's governance problems. For instance, while many think that bureaucracy's unchecked growth is the fundamental problem facing democracy today, pragmatism suggests the opposite: that public agencies can effectively manage the relationship between governance and democracy if they focus on building consent for public problem-solving. Ansell argues that wishing away bureaucracy will not do given what we know about the indispensible role of institutions in contemporary governance. Utilizing pragmatist concepts, Ansell rethinks the design of institutions, arguing that they are neither the simple products of rational design that can be endlessly tinkered with nor 'congealed taste'--where institutions represent the timeless customs and values of a people. Along with overcoming this dualism, Ansell also challenges us to rethink our approach to governance. Instead of moving from one extreme to the other--from bureaucracy to 'post-bureaucracy' or 'public entrepreneurialism'--pragmatism would not merely seek to replace one (hierarchical bureaucracy) with the other (a 'flat,' entrepreneurial organization), but rather to hitch the two approaches together in an innovative amalgam where organizational leaders constantly interact with and learn from street-level bureaucrats. Pragmatist Governance concludes that if government is to regain public trust, the technical knowledge of experts must be brought together with sensitivity to local problems, situations, and knowledge. The answer lies not, however, in a diminished bureaucracy. That may only deepen distrust. Rather, the emphasis should be on taking the best of both sides to find innovative and effective ways to solve enduring public problems. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $83.66 new (16% off) $99.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 9780199772438 0199772436 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSadao Tamura & Minoru Tokita (eds.) (2004). Symbiosis of Government and Market: The Private, the Public, and Bureaucracy. Routledgecurzon.
Jens Steffek (2010). Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):45-68.
Chukwunonye O. Emenalo (2012). Corporate Governance Systems as Dynamic Institutions: Towards a Dynamic Model of Corporate Governance Systems. African Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):39.
Mathias Koenig-Archibugi & Michael Zürn (eds.) (2006). New Modes of Governance in the Global System: Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cam Caldwell & Ranjan Karri (2005). Organizational Governance and Ethical Systems: A Covenantal Approach to Building Trust. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):249 - 259.
Katherine Marshall (2008). Ancient and Contemporary Wisdom and Practice on Governance as Religious Leaders Engage in International Development. Journal of Global Ethics 4 (3):217 – 229.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2012). Global Health Justice and Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
Rachel Haliburton (1997). Richard Rorty and the Problem of Cruelty. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):49-69.
Robert B. Talisse (2011). Toward a New Pragmatist Politics. Metaphilosophy 42 (5):552-571.
Geoff Moore (2012). The Virtue of Governance, the Governance of Virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):293-318.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-04-15Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
