Review of Tad M. Schmaltz, Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (2) (2003)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTad M. Schmaltz (1992). Descartes and Malebranche on Mind and Mind-Body Union. Philosophical Review 101 (2):281-325.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2002). Review: Learning From Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (442):367-373.
John Carriero (2008). Review of Tad M. Schmaltz, Descartes on Causation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5).
Richard A. Watson (2003). Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):415-416.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2004). Review: Malebranche. [REVIEW] Mind 113 (449):215-218.
Tad M. Schmaltz (1996). Malebranche's Theory of the Soul: A Cartesian Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Tad M. Schmaltz (1999). What Has Cartesianism To Do with Jansenism? Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (1):37-56.
J. G. Cottingham (2006). Review of Tad Schmaltz (Ed.), Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (12).
Tad M. Schmaltz (1995). Malebranche's Cartesianism and Lockean Colors. History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (4):387-403.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2002). Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,761 of 549,753 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,753 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
