David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (9):557-562 (2011)
Background Informed consent is a requirement for all research. It is not, however, clear how much information is sufficient to make an informed decision about participation in research. Information on an online questionnaire about childhood development was provided through an unfolding electronic participant sheet in three levels of information. Methods 552 participants, who completed the web-based survey, accessed and spent time reading the participant information sheet (PIS) between July 2008 and November 2009. The information behaviour of the participants was investigated. The first level contained less information than might be found on a standard PIS, the second level corresponded to a standard PIS, and the third contained more information than on a standard PIS. The actual time spent on reading the information provided in three incremental levels and the participants' evaluation of the information were calculated. Results 77% of the participants chose to access the first level of information, whereas 12% accessed the first two levels, 6% accessed all three levels of information and 23% participated without accessing information. The most accessed levels of information were those that corresponded to the average reading times. Conclusion The brief information provided in the first level was sufficient for participants to make informed decisions, while a sizeable minority of the participants chose not to access any information at all. This study adds to the debate about how much information is required to make a decision about participation in research and the results may help inform the future development of information sheets by providing data on participants' actual needs when deciding about questionnaire surveys
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ola Berger, Kari Sand, Ingunn Johansen, Jon Håvard Loge, Stein Kaasa & Bjørn Henning Grønberg (2014). What Do Cancer Patients and Members of Ethical Review Boards in Norway Consider Important Elements of Informed Consent Documents? Ajob Empirical Bioethics 5 (4):1-13.
Danielle Bromwich & Annette Rid (2015). Can Informed Consent to Research Be Adapted to Risk? Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):521-528.
Similar books and articles
Robbin Derry (1989). An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11):855 - 862.
Martin Tolich (2009). The Principle of Caveat Emptor: Confidentiality and Informed Consent as Endemic Ethical Dilemmas in Focus Group Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):99-108.
Marc Orlitzky (2001). Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):167 - 180.
Joan E. Sieber (2004). Empirical Research on Research Ethics. Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):397 – 412.
Dan R. Dalton & Idalene F. Kesner (1988). On the Dynamics of Corporate Size and Illegal Activity: An Empirical Assessment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (11):861 - 870.
Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara (2011). Reconsidering the Value of Consent in Biobank Research. Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Craig Lawson (1995). Research Participation as a Contract. Ethics and Behavior 5 (3):205 – 215.
Conrad V. Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Shaureen Taweel, Susan Shurin & Charles Weijer, Disclosure of the Right of Research Participants to Receive Research Results: An Analysis of Consent Forms in the Children's Oncology Group.
Tom Walker (2013). Respecting Autonomy Without Disclosing Information. Bioethics 27 (7):388-394.
Robert W. McGee & Wendy Gelman, Cheating on Taxes: A Comparative Study of Opinion in Six Latin American Countries and the USA.
E. Bjorn, P. Rossel & S. Holm (1999). Can the Written Information to Research Subjects Be Improved?--An Empirical Study. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):263-267.
Michael McDonald & Susan Cox (2009). Moving Toward Evidence-Based Human Participant Protection. Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):1-16.
Anne Marie Tassé (2011). The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (4):621-630.
Vassilios P. Filios (1986). Review and Analysis of the Empirical Research in Corporate Social Accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (4):291 - 306.
Added to index2011-08-20
Total downloads26 ( #148,263 of 1,902,101 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #84,508 of 1,902,101 )
How can I increase my downloads?