Book review To appear in the Bulletin of Symbolic Logic [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):480-84 (2000)
|Abstract||The emergence, over the last twenty years or so, of so-called “non-monotonic” logics represents one of the most signiﬁcant developments both in logic and artiﬁcial intelligence. These logics were devised in order to represent defeasible reasoning, i.e., that kind of inference in which reasoners draw conclusions tentatively, reserving the right to retract them in the light of further evidence|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William C. Purdy (2002). Review: Fred Sommers, George Englebretsen, An Invitation to Formal Reasoning. The Logic of Terms. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):97-100.
Anuj Dawar & Yuri Gurevich (2002). Fixed Point Logics. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):65-88.
Roderic A. Girle (2002). Review: Melvin Fitting, Richard L. Mendelsohn, First-Order Modal Logic. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):429-431.
Peter Koellner (2010). Strong Logics of First and Second Order. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (1):1-36.
G. Aldo Antonelli (2005). Grounded Consequence for Defeasible Logic. Cambridge University Press.
G. Aldo Antonelli (1996). Defeasible Reasoning as a Cognitive Model. In Krister Segerberg (ed.), The Parikh Project. Seven Papers in Honour of Rohit. Uppsala Prints & Preprints in Philosophy.
G. Aldo Antonelli, Non-Monotonic Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #247,490 of 751,308 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,892 of 751,308 )
How can I increase my downloads?