Graduate studies at Western
Dialectica 60 (4):475-483 (2006)
|Abstract||Papineau’s argument in "Thinking About Consciousness" for the vagueness or indeterminacy of phenomenal concepts is discussed. Several problems with his argument are brought out, and it is concluded that his argument fails to establish his desired conclusion.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Derek Ball (2009). There Are No Phenomenal Concepts. Mind 118 (472):935-962.
Bénédicte Veillet (2012). In Defense of Phenomenal Concepts. Philosophical Papers 41 (1):97-127.
Pär Sundström (2008). Is the Mystery an Illusion? Papineau on the Problem of Consciousness. Synthese 163 (2):133 - 143.
Michael Tye (2003). A Theory of Phenomenal Concepts. In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Minds and Persons. Cambridge University Press.
Jose Luis Bermudez (2004). Vagueness, Phenomenal Concepts and Mind-Brain Identity. Analysis 64 (2):131-139.
David Papineau (2011). Phenomenal Concepts and the Private Language Argument. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):175.
David Papineau (2006). Phenomenal and Perceptual Concepts. In Torin Alter & Sven Walter (eds.), Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
Tim Crane (2005). Papineau on Phenomenal Concepts. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):155-162.
Diana Raffman (2005). Some Thoughts About Thinking About Consciousness. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):163-170.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #24,495 of 741,159 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 741,159 )
How can I increase my downloads?