The Complexity of Revision, revised
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (2):75-78 (2002)
| Abstract | The purpose of this note is to acknowledge a gap in a previous paper — “The Complexity of Revision”, see [1] — and provide a corrected version of argument. The gap was originally pointed out by Francesco Orilia (personal communication and [4]), and the fix was developed in correspondence with Vann McGee | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGian Aldo Antonelli (1994). The Complexity of Revision. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):67-72.
Gian Aldo Antonelli (1996). What's in a Function? Synthese 107 (2):167 - 204.
Hans P. Van Ditmarsch (2005). Prolegomena to Dynamic Logic for Belief Revision. Synthese 147 (2):229 - 275.
Peter Gardenfors (1990). Belief Revision and Relevance. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:349 - 365.
G. Aldo Antonelli (1994). A Revision-Theoretic Analysis of the Arithmetical Hierarchy. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (2):204-218.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,473 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
