The desire for and pleasure of evil: The Augustinian limitations of Arendtian mind
Heythrop Journal 54 (1):89-100 (2013)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Wilker & Jack Nelson (1975). Pleasure and the Intrinsically Desired. Analysis 35 (April):152-159.
Andrew Brook (2006). Desire, Reward, Feeling: Commentary on Three Faces of Desire. Dialogue 45 (1):157-164.
Francis H. Bradley (1888). On Pleasure, Pain, Desire and Volition. Mind 13 (49):1-36.
Charles T. Mathewes (2001). Evil and the Augustinian Tradition. Cambridge University Press.
Eric Gregory (2003). Charles T. Mathewes, Evil and the Augustinian Tradition:Evil and the Augustinian Tradition. Ethics 113 (3):705-708.
Chris Heathwood (2007). The Reduction of Sensory Pleasure to Desire. Philosophical Studies 133 (1):23-44.
Timothy Schroeder (2004). Three Faces of Desire. Oxford University Press.
Chris Heathwood (2011). Desire-Based Theories of Reasons, Pleasure, and Welfare. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6:79-106.
Chris Heathwood (2006). Desire Satisfactionism and Hedonism. Philosophical Studies 128 (3):539-563.
Klocksiem (2010). Pleasure, Desire, and Oppositeness. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-11Total downloads6 ( #145,458 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
