"Who should survive?: One of the choices on our conscience": Mental retardation and the history of contemporary bioethics
Graduate studies at Western
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (3):205-224 (2006)
|Abstract||: The film "Who Should Survive?: One of the Choices on Our Conscience" contains a dramatization of the death of an infant with Down syndrome as the result of the parents' decision not to have a congenital intestinal obstruction surgically corrected. The dramatization was based on two similar cases at The Johns Hopkins Hospital and was financed by the Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr., Foundation. When "Who Should Survive?" was exhibited in 1971, the public reaction was generally critical of the parents' decision and the physicians' inaction. Although technological developments in medicine were a necessary condition for the production of this film and its unanticipated reception, they were not a sufficient condition. The proximate cause was a changed understanding of the capabilities of individuals with Down syndrome. Part of the impetus for this change was data showing the adverse effects of institutionalization on normal children|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kenneth Hickey & Laurie Lyckholm (2004). Child Welfare Versus Parental Autonomy: Medical Ethics, the Law, and Faith-Based Healing. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):265-276.
John J. Hardt (2008). The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
Ben Spiecker & Jan Steutel (2002). Sex Between People with "Mental Retardation": An Ethical Evaluation. Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):155-169.
Armand Matheny Antommaria (2009). Review of Holly Fernandez Lynch, Conflicts of Conscience in Health Care: An Institutional Compromise. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):63-64.
Daniel P. Sulmasy (2008). What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
Simo Vehmas (2002). Is It Wrong to Deliberately Conceive or Give Birth to a Child with Mental Retardation? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (1):47 – 63.
John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson & Christopher Seeds, Of Atkins and Men: Deviations From Clinical Definitions of Mental Retardation in Death Penalty Cases.
Kevin Wm Wildes (1997). Institutional Identity, Integrity, and Conscience. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):413-419.
Renée C. Fox (2008). Observing Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,865 of 757,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 757,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?