Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 4 (1):117-136 (2004)
|Abstract||The main reasons for the difficulty in understanding and translatingcheng may be summarized as follows. First, its prehistory is not always clear. This makes it troublesome to identify its original meaning. Second, the multiple sources from the three schools, Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism, often causecheng to be entangled with various concepts specifically affiliated to certain schools. The particular meanings of these concepts and their connections withcheng possibly mislead our effort to explore the core content ofcheng as such. Finally,cheng has been described as a force causing either transformation or change. In the former case, its influence is often exaggerated, while in the latter, it appears, more or less, mystical. However, despite all the complexity, the core content ofcheng is still identifiable. It consists of what two English terms- sincerity and reality -convey. In general, the termcheng can be properly applied to a person or thing so long as either one of them or the unity of them is present|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Li Jinglin & Lei Yongqiang (2009). On the Creativity and Innateness of the "Strong, Moving Vital Force": A Discussion of Feng Youlan's "Explanation of Mencius' Chapter on the 'Strong, Moving Vital Force' ". Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):198 - 210.
Wenyu Xie (2008). An, Yanming, the Idea of Cheng (Sincerity/Reality) in the History of Chinese Philosophy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (2):211-213.
Paul Wienpahl (1971). Ch'an Buddhism, Western Thought, and the Concept of Substance. Inquiry 14 (1-4):84 – 101.
Julia Tao (2005). Beyond Proceduralism: A Chinese Perspective on Cheng (Sincerity) as a Political Virtue. Philosophy East and West 55 (1):64-79.
Jinglin Li (2009). On the Creativity and Innateness of the “Strong, Moving Vital Force”: A Discussion of Feng Youlan's “Explanation of Mencius' Chapter on the 'Strong, Moving Vital Force'”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):198-210.
Yong Huang (2008). "WHY BE MORAL?" The Cheng Brothers' Neo-Confucian Answer. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):321-353.
Hsueh-Li Cheng (1984). Empty Logic: Madhyamika Buddhism From Chinese Sources. Philosophical Library.
Jinglin Li (2006). The Ontologicalization of the Confucian Concept of Xin Xing: Zhou Lianxi's Founding Contribution to the Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (2):204-221.
Yanming An (2004). Western 'Sincerity' and Confucian 'Cheng'. Asian Philosophy 14 (2):155 – 169.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads2 ( #232,382 of 549,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?