Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):820-840 (2002)
|Abstract||Can a supercompact cardinal κ be Laver indestructible when there is a level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness? In this article, we show that if there is a sufficiently large cardinal above κ, then no, it cannot. Conversely, if one weakens the requirement either by demanding less indestructibility, such as requiring only indestructibility by stratified posets, or less level-by-level agreement, such as requiring it only on measure one sets, then yes, it can|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Arthur W. Apter (1999). On Measurable Limits of Compact Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1675-1688.
Parker Crutchfield (2011). Representing High-Level Properties in Perceptual Experience. Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):279 - 294.
Arthur W. Apter (1981). Measurability and Degrees of Strong Compactness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (2):249-254.
Arthur W. Apter (2001). Supercompactness and Measurable Limits of Strong Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):629-639.
Arthur W. Apter (1998). Laver Indestructibility and the Class of Compact Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):149-157.
Joel David Hamkins (1998). Small Forcing Makes Any Cardinal Superdestructible. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):51-58.
Gillman Payette & Blaine D'Entremont (2006). Level Compactness. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (4):545-555.
Arthur W. Apter & Moti Gitik (1998). The Least Measurable Can Be Strongly Compact and Indestructible. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1404-1412.
Joel David Hamkins & Saharon Shelah (1998). Superdestructibility: A Dual to Laver's Indestructibility. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):549-554.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,976 of 738,566 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,566 )
How can I increase my downloads?