Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1675-1688 (1999)
|Abstract||We extend earlier work (both individual and joint with Shelah) and prove three theorems about the class of measurable limits of compact cardinals, where a compact cardinal is one which is either strongly compact or supercompact. In particular, we construct two models in which every measurable limit of compact cardinals below the least supercompact limit of supercompact cardinals possesses non-trivial degrees of supercompactness. In one of these models, every measurable limit of compact cardinals is a limit of supercompact cardinals and also a limit of strongly compact cardinals having no non-trivial degree of supercompactness. We also show that it is consistent for the least supercompact cardinal κ to be a limit of strongly compact cardinals and be so that every measurable limit of compact cardinals below κ has a non-trivial degree of supercompactness. In this model, the only compact cardinals below κ with a non-trivial degree of supercompactness are the measurable limits of compact cardinals|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Arthur W. Apter & James Cummings (2000). Identity Crises and Strong Compactness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1895-1910.
Jouko Väänänen (1982). Abstract Logic and Set Theory. II. Large Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (2):335-346.
Andrés Villaveces (1999). Heights of Models of ZFC and the Existence of End Elementary Extensions II. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1111-1124.
Arthur W. Apter (1981). Measurability and Degrees of Strong Compactness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (2):249-254.
Arthur W. Apter (2001). Supercompactness and Measurable Limits of Strong Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):629-639.
Arthur W. Apter (2001). Some Structural Results Concerning Supercompact Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1919-1927.
Arthur W. Apter & Moti Gitik (1998). The Least Measurable Can Be Strongly Compact and Indestructible. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1404-1412.
Joel David Hamkins (1999). Gap Forcing: Generalizing the Lévy-Solovay Theorem. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):264-272.
Arthur W. Apter (1998). Laver Indestructibility and the Class of Compact Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):149-157.
Arthur W. Apter & Joel David Hamkins (2003). Exactly Controlling the Non-Supercompact Strongly Compact Cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):669-688.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?