David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kant-Studien 70 (1-4):17-34 (1979)
One approach sees aesthetic pleasure as distinctively caused (by interplay of the cognitive faculties involved in apprehending an object) and accompanied by a distinctive judgment (that everyone ought to respond thus). I suggest a closer tie between affective and cognitive aspects: the pleasure is referred to its object, Not simply through causal relations with the cognitive faculties involved, But through itself receiving the very form constituting apprehension in the first place. This avoids certain difficulties concerning intentionality. It also respects kant's claim that while aesthetic judgment's demand for assent is the same in form as that of predicative judgments, One's pleasure itself, And not a judgment externally connected with it, Is what expresses that demand
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
C. E. Emmer (2001). The Senses of the Sublime: Possibilities for a Non-Ocular Sublime in Kant's Critique of Judgment. In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.), Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter.
Jennifer McMahon (2011). Critical Aesthetic Realism. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (2):49-69.
Xialing Xie (2009). Aesthetic Judgment: The Power of the Mind in Understanding Confucianism. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):38-51.
Xie Xialing & Gao Limin (2009). Aesthetic Judgment: The Power of the Mind in Understanding Confucianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):38 - 51.
Immanuel Kant (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Albert Hofstadter (1975). Kant's Aesthetic Revolution. Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.
Danielle Lories (2006). Remarks on Aesthetic Intentionality: Husserl or Kant. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):31 – 49.
William Henry Werkmeister (1974). Kant as Philosophical Anthropologist, And: Kant's Principle of Personality, And: Kant Et le Problème du Mal, And: The Notion of Form in Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, And: Immanuel Kant: Briefwechsel (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (3):405-410.
Adrian M. S. Piper (2009). Intuition and Concrete Particularity in Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic. In Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O'Connor (eds.), Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices From Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Stanford University Press.
Theodore A. Gracyk (1990). Are Kant's “Aesthetic Judgment” and “Judgment of Taste” Synonymous? International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (2):159-172.
Steven Ravett Brown (2000). A Comment on the Mechanism of the Generation of Aesthetic Ideas in Kant's Critique of Judgment. [Journal (Paginated)] (in Press).
Luigi Caranti (2005). Logical Purposiveness and the Principle of Taste. Kant-Studien 96 (3):364-374.
G. Anthony Bruno (2009). Aesthetic Value, Intersubjectivity and the Absolute Conception of the World. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 6 (3).
Fred L. Rush (2001). The Harmony of the Faculties. Kant-Studien 92 (1):38-61.
Added to index2012-03-22
Total downloads13 ( #127,403 of 1,102,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #68,255 of 1,102,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?