Chalmers' zombie argument
In Type-a Dualism: A Novel Theory of the Mental-Physical Nexus. Dissertation, Central European University (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAmir Horowitz (2009). Turning the Zombie on its Head. Synthese 170 (1):191 - 210.
Charles Huenemann (2004). The Sage Meets the Zombie: Spinoza's Wise Man and Chalmers' The Conscious Mind. Studia Spinozana 14:21-33.
Wallace I. Matson (2003). Zombies Begone! Against Chalmers' Mind/Brain Dualism. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 24 (1):123-136.
David J. Chalmers (2004). Imagination, Indexicality, and Intensions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):182-90.
Sydney Shoemaker (1999). On David Chalmers's The Conscious Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (2):439-444.
Anthony L. Brueckner (2001). Chalmers' Conceivability Argument for Dualism. Analysis 61 (3):187-193.
Keith Frankish (2007). The Anti-Zombie Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):650–666.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads344 ( #291 of 548,976 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,091 of 548,976 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
