The "psychosomatic" family system: are families with Eating Disorders more enmeshed and rigid than normal controls?
Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (1):10-15 (2011)
|Abstract||Traditionally, the key features of the family system of Eating Disorders (EDs) have been considered those originally outlined by Minuchin in his description of the "psychosomatic" family patterns of interaction. This controlled study tests two of the principal characteristics of Minuchin's model, namely enmeshment and rigidity, operationalised as extreme cohesion and low adaptability. Perceived and desired cohesion and adaptability, measured with the FACES III, were compared between 30 clinical families (mothers, fathers and daughters with an ED) and 30 non-clinical families. Differences across ED family members were also considered, as well as differences between ED symptomatological subgroups (restricting anorectics vs EDs with bulimic symptoms). High cohesion scores were found in ED families, but similar findings were also reported in control families. Cohesion scores were significantly higher in restricting anorectics than in patients with bulimic symptoms. Adaptability was normal in both ED and control families. This study does not support Minuchin's observations on family enmeshment and rigidity. Although high levels of cohesion were found in ED families, the same relational pattern was found in the control families, suggesting that a tendency to a hyper-involvement of family members might be "normal" in some sociocultural contexts.|
|Keywords||anorexia bulimia family structure family therapy systemic therapy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barry Hoffmaster & Wayne Weston (1987). The Patient in the Family and the Family in the Patient. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Fiona A. White, Pauline Howie & Janette Perz (2000). Predictors of Moral Thought in Two Contrasting Adolescent Samples. Ethics and Behavior 10 (3):199 – 214.
Miloš S. Kurilić (2001). Cohen-Stable Families of Subsets of Integers. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):257-270.
Yonathan Reshef (2013). Rethinking the Value of Families. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):130-150.
Anca Gheaus (2012). Is the Family Uniquely Valuable? Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):120-131.
David J. Doukas, Using the Family Covenant in Planning End-of-Life Care: Obligations and Promises of Patients, Families, and Physicians.
J. Mark Halstead (1999). Moral Education in Family Life: The Effects of Diversity. Journal of Moral Education 28 (3):265-281.
Christian Munthe & Thomas Hartvigsson (2012). The Best Interest of Children and the Basis of Family Policy: The Issue of Reproductive Caring Units. In Daniela Cutas & Sarah Chan (eds.), Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. Bloomsbury Academic.
Sabrina Brahms (2002). Design as a Tool for Family Evolutionary Guidance. World Futures 58 (5 & 6):425 – 432.
Charles P. Samenow, Scott T. Yabiku, Marine Ghulyan, Betsy Williams & William Swiggart (2012). The Role of Family of Origin in Physicians Referred to a CME Course. HEC Forum 24 (2):115-126.
Otmar Spinas (2004). Analytic Countably Splitting Families. Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (1):101-117.
Sara A. Morris (2005). Corporate Social Performance in Family Firms. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:154-159.
Michael Hrušák & Salvador García Ferreira (2003). Ordering Mad Families a la Katětov. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1337-1353.
Added to index2011-09-25
Total downloads25 ( #55,603 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #9,747 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?