Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):285-286 (2003)
|Abstract||Hurford argues that propositions of the form PREDICATE(x) represent conceptual structures that predate language and that can be explicated in terms of neural structure. I disagree, arguing that such predicates are descriptions of limited aspects of brain function, not available as representations in the brain to be exploited in the frog or monkey brain and turned into language in the human.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bencie Woll (2003). The Neural Representation of Spatial Predicate-Argument Structures in Sign Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):300-301.
Michael W. Spratling (2004). Local Versus Distributed: A Poor Taxonomy of Neural Coding Strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):700-702.
Yoonsuck Choe (2006). How Neural is the Neural Blackboard Architecture? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):72-73.
Rohit Parikh (1996). Vague Predicates and Language Games. Theoria 11 (3):97-107.
Michael L. Anderson (2010). Neural Reuse: A Fundamental Organizational Principle of the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):245.
Michael A. Arbib & Péter Érdi (2000). Précis of Neural Organization: Structure, Function, and Dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):513-533.
James R. Hurford (2003). The Neural Basis of Predicate-Argument Structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):261-283.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,923 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?