Carole Ulanowsky, ed., The Family in the Age of Biotechnology

Radical Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

HIV and Pregnancy.Brenda Almond & Carole Ulanowsky - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (2):16-21.
Тип: Статья в журнале-научная статья язык: Английский том: 11 номер: 1 год: 1997 страницы: 75-89 цит. В ринц®: 0.Carole Ulanowsky, Miles Little, Andrew Grubb, Maxwell J. Mehlman, Lennart Nordenfelt, David Lamb & Becky Cox White - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (1):75-89.
The three teachings of biotechnology.Mickey Gjerris - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology?Lawrence Busch & John R. Lloyd - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
The family in the age of biotechnology.G. R. Dunstan - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (1):58-59.
The ethics of agri-food biotechnology : how can an agricultural technology be so important?Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
A framework for translating biotechnology experiences to nanotechnology.David Sparling - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Biotechnology, nanotechnology, media, and public opinion.Susanna Priest - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
How Not to Interpret the Advances of Biotechnology.Giridhari L. Pandit - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):93-102.
Parental meta-emotion structure predicts family and child outcomes.Carole Hooven, John Mordechai Gottman & Lynn Fainsilber Katz - 1995 - Cognition and Emotion 9 (2-3):229-264.
Surveys of Distance Learning in the Virginia Community College System by Carole Schultz.Carole Schultz - 2001 - Inquiry (ERIC) 6 (2):34-38.
Agricultural biotechnology and the future benefits argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Biotechnology and Faith. Relativism in the Postmodern Moral. A Christian-Orthodox Approach.Stefan Iloaie - 2009 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 8 (22):38-52.
Genetic resources, traditional knowledge and the law: solutions for access and benefit sharing.Evanson C. Kamau & Gerd Winter (eds.) - 2009 - Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Archard
Lancaster University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references