Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):314-321 (2008)
|Abstract||abstract Martha Nussbaum's concern is to limit the role that emotions can legitimately play in the definition of the criminal law. She would allow nuisance laws to curtail the occasioning of disgust but only disgust of a certain kind. Problems arise for her account when she extends this analysis to the prevention of offensiveness. Unavoidable is an evaluation of those beliefs subscription to which explains the taking of offence. Hence the principal problem for a liberalism of the kind Nussbaum defends is how to combine Mill's harm principle with a Rawlsian understanding of the reasonableness of belief.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michelle Meagher (2003). Jenny Saville and a Feminist Aesthetics of Disgust. Hypatia 18 (4):23-41.
David Pizarro, Yoel Inbar & Chelsea Helion (2011). On Disgust and Moral Judgment. Emotion Review 3 (3):267-268.
Carolyn Korsmeyer (2010). Savoring Disgust: The Foul and the Fair in Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Richard Arneson (2007). Shame, Stigma, and Disgust in the Decent Society. Journal of Ethics 11 (1):31 - 63.
Thom Brooks (2007). Hiding From Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (3):329–331.
Alexandra Plakias (2013). The Good and the Gross. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):261-278.
Judith André (2005). Review Essay / Disgust, Dignity, and a Public Intellectual. Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1):52-57.
John Deigh (2006). The Politics of Disgust and Shame. Journal of Ethics 10 (4):383 - 418.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #43,142 of 556,840 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )
How can I increase my downloads?