Responsibility and Judgment
Schocken Books (2003)
|Abstract||Each of the books that Hannah Arendt published in her lifetime was unique, and to this day each continues to provoke fresh thought and interpretations. This was never more true than for Eichmann in Jerusalem, her account of the trial of Adolf Eichmann, where she first used the phrase “the banality of evil.” Her consternation over how a man who was neither a monster nor a demon could nevertheless be an agent of the most extreme evil evoked derision, outrage, and misunderstanding. The firestorm of controversy prompted Arendt to readdress fundamental questions and concerns about the nature of evil and the making of moral choices. Responsibility and Judgment gathers together unpublished writings from the last decade of Arendt’s life, as she struggled to explicate the meaning of Eichmann in Jerusalem. At the heart of this book is a profound ethical investigation, “Some Questions of Moral Philosophy”; in it Arendt confronts the inadequacy of traditional moral “truths” as standards to judge what we are capable of doing, and she examines anew our ability to distinguish good from evil and right from wrong. We see how Arendt comes to understand that alongside the radical evil she had addressed in earlier analyses of totalitarianism, there exists a more pernicious evil, independent of political ideology, whose execution is limitless when the perpetrator feels no remorse and can forget his acts as soon as they are committed. Responsibility and Judgment is an essential work for understanding Arendt’s conception of morality; it is also an indispensable investigation into some of the most troubling and important issues of our time.|
|Keywords||Political ethics Responsibility Judgment Political participation|
|Buy the book||$7.01 used (59% off) $9.56 new (44% off) $14.69 direct from Amazon (14% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||JA79.A73 2003|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Craig Reeves (2009). 'Exploding the Limits of Law': Judgment and Freedom in Arendt and Adorno. Res Publica 15 (2):137-164.
Seyla Benhabib (ed.) (2010). Politics in Dark Times: Encounters with Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
Avery Goldman (2010). An Antinomy of Political Judgment: Kant, Arendt, and the Role of Purposiveness in Reflective Judgment. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):331-352.
Dianna Taylor (2002). Hannah Arendt on Judgement: Thinking for Politics. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (2):151 – 169.
Linda M. G. Zerilli (2005). "We Feel Our Freedom": Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory 33 (2):158 - 188.
Arne Johan Vetlesen (1998). Impartiality and Evil: A Reconsideration Provoked by Genocide in Bosnia. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (5):1-35.
Alice MacLachlan, An Ethic of Plurality: Reconciling Politics and Morality in Hannah Arendt. History and Judgment: IWM JVF Conference Vol. 21.
Paul Formosa (2007). Is Radical Evil Banal? Is Banal Evil Radical? Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735.
Dana Richard Villa (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
Garrath Williams (1998). Love and Responsibility: A Political Ethic for Hannah Arendt. Political Studies 46 (5):937-950.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?