Descartes as critic of Galileo's scientific methodology
Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90 (1986)
| Abstract | Some philosophers of science suggest that philosophical assumptions must influence historical scholarship, because history (like science) has no neutral data and because the treatment of any particular historical episode is going to be influenced to some degree by one's prior philosophical conceptions of what is important in science. However, if the history of science must be laden with philosophical assumptions, then how can the history of science be evidence for the philosophy of science? Would not an inductivist history of science confirm an inductivist philosophy of science and a conventionalist history of science confirm a conventionalist philosophy of science? I attempt to resolve this problem; essentially, I deny the claim that the history of science must be influenced by one's conception of what is important in science — one's general philosophy of science. To accomplish the task I look at a specific historical episode, together with its history, and draw some metamethodological conclusions from it. The specific historical episode I examine is Descartes' critique of Galileo's scientific methodology. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEduard Glas (1979). Chemistry and Physiology in Their Historical and Philosophical Relations. Delft University Press.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Neil Thomason (1994). Sherlock Holmes, Galileo, and the Missing History of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:323 - 333.
James T. Cushing (1998). Philosophical Concepts in Physics: The Historical Relation Between Philosophy and Scientific Theories. Cambridge University Press.
F. Michael Akeroyd (2002). Philosophy of Science and History3 of Science: A Non Troubling Interaction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1):159-162.
Kurt Bayertz (1991). Forschungsprogramm Und Wissenschaftsentwicklung. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (2):229 - 243.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Steffen Ducheyne (2010). Whewell's Tidal Researches: Scientific Practice and Philosophical Methodology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):26-40.
Peter Machamer & Franccsca Di Poppa (2001). Rational Reconstructions Revised. Theoria 16 (3):461-480.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,853 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
